netmindz

@ewoudwijma looks nicer and should be indexable by Google, though that's for the newer MoonModules rather than the 0.13 maintenance release here. Should I raise an issue against MM to...

The comment in the docs "you'll need to then configure the yaml yourself - the type part is filled out for you." gives no indication as to how you do...

Related to possibly, but this is about 12 pm so should always be 12

As I might not have an ESP8266 to hand when doing the code review, if you could please include a screenshot of the Audio Reactive settings, including the sync dropdown...

@gaaat98 The main reason I didn't go back and create a PR for upstream is that as I'm sure you found already that there is too much divergence to just...

Looking again at that PR I'm not sure why it's showing so many changes that don't directly relate to the work, it should be pretty much only changes inside the...

Looks like some of the changes simply relate to fixing 8266 issues that related to the fact that we weren't doing any 8266 builds after we ended support

> @netmindz I can confirm that porting the feature is just a matter of porting your version of audio_reactive.h and audio_source.h and add the compile option for the audioreactive usermod...

If we change from byte to uint16 then we will also need to change the dmx code as effect mode is limited to 255. I would be in favour of...

> Wow! I'm shocked at how cleanly that slots in. Nice. Thanks :) > I have both a Matrix S3 and a Mesmerizer (nightdriverled.com) so I may try spinning a...