fix(core): always bind global modules when scan for modules

[5d-jh]

trafficstars

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

• [x] The commit message follows our guidelines: https://github.com/nestjs/nest/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
• [x] Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• [ ] Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

• [x] Bugfix
• [ ] Feature
• [ ] Code style update (formatting, local variables)
• [ ] Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• [ ] Build related changes
• [ ] CI related changes
• [ ] Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: #12879

What is the new behavior?

Scanning for modules always bound for global modules,

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

• [ ] Yes
• [ ] No

Other information

This branch is based on 9.4.3. Hence should not be merged into master.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build de00f050-29aa-4a07-94cd-4a5c3beeb9b5

• 7 of 8 (87.5%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
• 199 unchanged lines in 30 files lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.7%) to 92.992%

---

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
packages/core/scanner.ts	7	8	87.5%
<!--	Total:	7	8

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
packages/common/pipes/file/file-type.validator.ts	1	87.5%
packages/common/pipes/parse-enum.pipe.ts	1	94.44%
packages/common/pipes/parse-float.pipe.ts	1	92.31%
packages/common/pipes/parse-int.pipe.ts	1	92.86%
packages/common/pipes/parse-uuid.pipe.ts	1	94.74%
packages/common/pipes/validation.pipe.ts	1	94.34%
packages/core/services/reflector.service.ts	1	95.0%
packages/microservices/server/server-redis.ts	1	97.01%
packages/microservices/client/client-rmq.ts	2	81.42%
packages/platform-express/multer/interceptors/file-fields.interceptor.ts	2	88.24%
<!--	Total:	199

Totals
Change from base Build 439f5e56-8568-4500-9046-115a7dca6920:	0.7%
Covered Lines:	6555
Relevant Lines:	7049

---

💛 - Coveralls

[5d-jh]

Could you create release branch for 9.x so this branch merged?

[kamilmysliwiec]

Just fyi, in case you're blocked by this change you can always use patch-package to fix this up for your project.

[micalevisk]

@5d-jh can you please rebase your branch

[5d-jh]

@micalevisk Because this pr resolves issue on v9, this pr should be merged into v9 release branch which is currently not exist.