Nicholas Blumhardt

Looking good! I'll loop back to this ASAP - sorry about the delay

I think the synchronization-free stack allocation approach looks really promising; I'm inclined towards avoiding the atomics and heading in that direction - what do you think @sungam3r?

Discussion on the linked PR concluded with `wontfix`

Closing this in favour of #1820 where we've carried on this discussion.

This one's now been open a long time; I think there's still more to explore (could we just polyfill `DynamicallyAccessedMembers` for downlevel targets? Some unnecessary feature constants, etc.) but let's...

I'd love to dig into possibilities here further, but I think it's stalled so I'll close it now as stale. Feel free to jump in if you're considering picking this...

Thanks for sharing ISLE, @fedarovich! I don't think anything's moving forward here in core Serilog just now, but I'm still watching this space keenly. Closing the ticket as stale, but...

@scascalespAV hopefully some leads/ideas to follow there. It's a bit out of scope for the Serilog core project so I'll close this but good luck and I hope you find...

I'm working through open issues and closing most of those that have no activity in the past 12 months as `stale`. This helps us track and prioritize the issues that...

Alternative added to the sinks wiki page 👍