Nathan Vander Wilt

Interesting, clever for them to go the mDNS route to hide those. As an aside, if they actually start [letting the user resolve mDNS addresses](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=405925) (e.g. my laptop's mDNS name...

Via https://github.com/vitalets/webrtc-ips/issues/3#issuecomment-493507388, there's some discussion at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/discuss-webrtc/l0gc3RjBhc0/FsMqOlOSBwAJ and even a draft RFC for the feature: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates-02

Looks like the current flag for this is chrome://flags/#enable-webrtc-hide-local-ips-with-mdns "Anonymize local IPs exposed by WebRTC." if anyone wants to opt out of the privacy protections here.

No worries! As discussed around https://github.com/natevw/PeerPouch/issues/11#issuecomment-58688368, there's things I'd like to do (e.g. splitting out useful components and updating them to latest Pouch) but so far they've remained way down...

(I'm not eager to spend my own time working around Chargify's broken responses but filing this as a known issue at least and would be willing to review a pull...

Oh, maybe this this is a longstanding thing, since in my notes about migrating to Fermata instead I mentioned one of the benefits being: > improved callback arguments (an error...

[actually c.f. #6, why not Apache "PeerPouch" and MIT/BSD the handler helpers…]

Thanks for starting this! I wonder if mainly the list of `methods` at https://github.com/ssured/PeerPouch/blob/efd896ff5bc30e4b2684b79e544bd6c2ee1e2609/pouch.webrtc.js#L78 just needs to be adjusted? You probably noticed this already, but PeerPouch is implemented as an...

Ah, cool tip on the whitespace, thanks!

@freegroup Thanks for trying out node-nrf! Did you see the note at https://github.com/natevw/node-nrf/#troubleshooting about SPI not working after using C++ RF24 library? I suspect this could be the only problem,...