Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard

> I'm very tempted to suggest we split the file in two, and only try to share the second part between 3.6 and 1.0. If we go this route and...

PS: can you update the description to reflect the new reduced scope?

> Couldn't we just wait until `USE_PSA` is removed and then put all of the `*PSA_INIT()` and `*PSA_DONE()` macros behind a big `#if MBEDTLS_VERSION_MAJOR < 4` guard? It's not just...

> Splitting cleanup-related declarations, the decision of calling init, support for exotic options and whatever else would be rather cleaning up a bit. Indeed, but I think the part of...

@Harry-Ramsey @eleuzi01 Added two commits while preparing the 3.6 backport, in order to get both branches aligned. Please review again.

I agree this is very low priority, and may not need addressing unless this is made moot by some other change - unless of course we start seeing more of...

See https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/TF-PSA-Crypto/pull/145#discussion_r2059752115 and https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/TF-PSA-Crypto/pull/145#discussion_r2059752115