Brian Gesiak

I believe this issue will be fixed by this LLVM patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71826

Awesome, thanks @istx25! Let me know how it goes.

Ooh, very good point--thanks for bringing this up @angerman! :+1: I'm actually not sure which would be less surprising to users: 1. "My before suites aren't running! Why?" (an hour...

Hmm, you make a good point. As long as `beforeSuite` and `afterSuite` appear within the context of a single spec class, it makes sense to associate them with a single...

@angerman No worries! If you ever have some spare time and this issue is still open, feel free to comment here. :smile:

When I need my XCTestCase subclasses to run in a specific order, I name them like so: ``` Foo_00_TestCase Foo_01_TestCase Foo_02_TestCase ``` This ensures that `Foo_02_TestCase` runs after `Foo_00_TestCase`. It's...

Wow, is that a recent change? I could have sworn this used to work.

Thanks for the suggestion, @J-Rojas! It is deterministic, and based on alphabetical order. Quick doesn't do anything special in this regard, this behavior comes from XCTest. So a test case...

Yeah, that API looks really great! Thanks for researching the other testing frameworks, too. Would you like to try implementing this?

Yeah, I think this would be rad.