Matthieu Napoli

I'm sorry @techbirds unfortunately at this time we don't have the bandwidth to review this PR :/

Hi @PierreKiwi, the issue is currently: At the moment we unfortunately don't have the capacity to tackle that problem in the near future, using the plugin sounds like a good...

@P0lk0 feel free to open another pull request following @pgrzesik's recommendations. It seems at this time this PR is stalled awaiting improvements, so we cannot merge it in its current...

For reference we support ES modules for plugins: https://github.com/serverless/serverless/issues/10645 (PR: #10657) I'm guessing you'd like to use `export` for `serverless.js` configuration?

@git-chrisp got it, so to sum it up: You would like to use `export` instead of `module.exports` in `serverless.js`/`serverless.ts` configuration, is that correct?

@richarddd local invoke isn't really comparable though (some scenarios require using Docker). The question still stands though: is there anything to improve here/what are the issues currently experienced with the...

I'm reopening https://github.com/serverless/serverless/issues/11180 / https://github.com/serverless/serverless/discussions/11181 because: - the documentation mentions the `${self:}` syntax - the code seems to contain mentions and of `${self:}` So: - either the feature is no...

Got it, so the documentation needs to be updated then.

@pgrzesik @medikoo Is this something that would make sense to merge?

@ccornici thanks for following the template for reporting. I note that you are still on v2: you might want to upgrade to v3 as v2 is no longer supported. To...