Miloš Lapiš

**@**[**ywarezk**](https://github.com/ywarezk) I can imagine a particular addition to the actual DI, when you would be able to inject manually more things, like providers or view providers are today on a...

[**@ywarezk**](https://github.com/ywarezk) Yep, but it also true that one component from the outside point of view doesn't mean that inner complexity is trivial. It only means that there is only one...

[**@ywarezk**](https://github.com/ywarezk) It depends. Multi-point entries to packages always tend to be always less flexible and less optimized from the tree-shaking point of view. It's possible, of course, but the design...

Take a look at @ghetolay plunker http://plnkr.co/edit/1BhydChJgFiPSWCDFpjm?p=preview to explain the case.

So the same thing as: https://blog.thoughtram.io/angular/2016/06/22/model-driven-forms-in-angular-2.html#forms-with-a-single-control?

... https://angular.io/guide/template-syntax where ``.

@pfeileon ... isn't it the reason why this new syntax was introduced? To have tree-shakable services?

@dariobraun ... but this is the basic assumption and the main reason why tree-shaking exits. If nothing is using such a service then why to have it in the code?

@dariobraun ... yep. I am used to repeating some facts because I want to be sure that it's understandable (better twice than once 😺 ) ... and it's my vice....

@HeeCheol-Kim ... and what is the `Length` in ``?