mklcp

Yeah that's the problem, for more than a single key it doesn't really make sense

From CLL 1.1, after Example 10.73: „The interpretation of ZAhO tcita differs from that of FAhA, VA, PU, and ZI tcita, however.“. But only PU is working no for {broda...

In Command Palette, setting "LSP: Disable Language Server Globally" (or in Project) was enough for me. LSP-copilot can be disabled if you want, but not others.

> lḑ—‘trivalent polarity’—has nil to do with -LḐ- —tree Argh, I thought we said to JQ not to do this > -šv, -ct, … are cool Yes, and I think...

@porpoiseless > The difference between EFF and ERG is important. (For instance, it marks the difference between manslaughter and murder.) It is important, but do we really need it for...

> CTE is essential to my affix concept since it gives you a means of omitting a Case access. Which is useful at times: -STM/CTE:‘feel’ ‘the feeling induced by X’;...

> Also, yesterday, @porpoiseless and I discussed a potential ‘complement’ Case which would tag a secondary theme, complementing the primary theme (THM) without physical involvement (X is related to Y,...

> ‘2 km is the size of this mountain’ would have ‘2 km’ in the THM and ‘this mountain’ in this new case. Ah, ok. I hope then that the...

> This makes no sense to me. How is what you’re describing different from the new Essential case? And then, your example suggests the use of Functive… Yeah, but I...

> How do you envision Case? More like accessors to a common argument structure shared by all verbs. Not that this argument structure is inherent or natural, it should be...