Daniel Mendler

On 2/22/23 05:58, Omar Antolín Camarena wrote: > So you're saying the default does not behave as described in the > documentation? And that in particular |!term| is not a...

On 2/22/23 05:22, Robert Weiner wrote: > First, orderless is wonderful but I find the out-of-the-box > configuration too minimal for typical use cases. I read the doc quoted >...

@oantolin Yes, but this is a "feature request", not a "bug report". You started calling it a bug. ;) Admittedly I use strict requirements to classify something as a bug....

Indeed, one can consider that a bug report. I suspect that the problem is that @rswgnu missed to evaluate some configuration, e.g., resetting `completion-category-defaults` and `completion-category-overrides`, such that another completion...

It seems autoloading keymaps is also possible directly, see for example https://github.com/protesilaos/tmr/blob/46048fa826b3e7ffcf56c09949ac2f6d52ae5d6b/tmr.el#L607-L608

@Stebalien Have you seen this patch? What do you think about it?

Orderless support in Company is highly dependent on the backend. It only works with company-capf, and also only with a subset of the available Capfs (completion-at-point-functions). Which backend do you...

A minimal config would be good to have. But to be clear - the only backend included should be company-capf since this is the only one which can use Orderless....

I think this issue can be closed since it is quite old, with no further response. Company support for completion styles is limited (only company-capf and company-dabbrev) and Company isn't...

The gem owner is @joaomilho. Can you please prepare a new release? You can also add me as owner if you like.