Mikkel Nylander Bundgaard

Sounds like a nice addition, albeit I usually have instance test methods (too lazy to write the `static` :)).

> @manfred-brands Thank you! Didn't know how to rebase without the conflict so 2 commits finally. No problem. We can also do a "squash and merge" when merging this in,...

Hi @Antash I did some manual testing and found some issues (I should have thought of these when I did the review and I'm sorry for the very long comment...

Perhaps also check whether the test method is abstract, see https://github.com/nunit/nunit/blob/db5bee0f8bb74d68202377917f6d958c0e139bfd/src/NUnitFramework/framework/Internal/Builders/NUnitTestCaseBuilder.cs#L145

Handling public test methods have been extracted into #245

I was thinking the same. If you prefer to have a "clean slate" wrt. open NUnit issues you have created, then I can also create a new issue a replacement...

Sounds like a good idea. I haven't used parallel execution of tests much, so I'm a bit on unknown territory, but it seems that one can figure out if an...

I think it makes sense to group the constants together that belong together. Now it is - in some cases - too easy to select the wrong constant by mistake,...

I agree that this is an odd behaviour, and I also run into it many years ago, There is a https://docs.nunit.org/articles/nunit/writing-tests/constraints/ReusableConstraint.html which suggest that you can wrap you constraint in...

This sounds related to nunit/nunit3-vs-adapter#722 or nunit/nunit3-vs-adapter#973. Does it help to clean up VS temp files.