Michael Dilger

This looks about right. I didn't study it in detail, but I like the non-replaceable response event, the use of an 'e' tag instead of a 'd' tag, the option...

I have used negative-sentiment emojis in jest multiple times. I would hate for them to be interpreted as downvotes. +1

I cannot think of a use case where I want to ask a relay for only events that have the same tag twice with two different values.

Instead of the special rules at the end about not mixing ANDs and ORs, this could have been specified in [disjunctive normal form](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjunctive_normal_form) as an array of arrays, where the...

Example: Maybe you want to ask for "(Movie and 4k) or (Audio and 256kbps)". This could be represented as: ``` "#t": [["Movie", "4k"], ["Audio","256kbps"]] ``` You could mix in other...

> Oh, ok, I understand. I can see benefits to it. > > I suppose my main argument against that format would be that it breaks the fundamental typing of...

> > you don't need to run signer on the same pubkey as the target pubkey (the one you want to sign as) > > Are you saying that the...

If this becomes widely implemented, I could see someone posting an ephemeral public request for missing events, and then thousands of clients all responding with those events flooding the relay...

Ok, I was wrong. Looking closer, the signer has to be addressed by the key it is signing as because the commands don't include that key (except connect). As it...

There are reasons to want negative filters If we had negative filters, I could use a local relay instead of a local custom database with a custom interface. I would...