Mikael Mello

I agree it has its benefits. Using a struct provides better readability when reading the values (e.g. `color.r` instead of `color.0`), but I think only the underlying terminal library actually...

Both your points are perfect to me. It _can_ get cumbersome on pattern matching and the like but I quite like to be explicit as well. Let's go with the...

That is a good idea and I'll certainly work on it once I have the time. Could you tell me a little bit more about your use case? Feel free...

>It won't be easy if you are going to keep the package crossplatform. Can't say I have much experience on that front, what kind of challenges are you expecting? I...

@gopherine unfortunately it isn't in our plans due to how complex a multi-line editor would be I'd gladly review any PRs but it should be a lot of work to...

Unfortunately there isn't really much of a point in keeping this open. Even Github's CLI uses a text editor for larger inputs. The point about accepting it if someone implements...

Hi @seancarroll! That's right, I managed to write a few tests and actually planned to expose this API sometime in the future, but the reason I didn't until now was...

We can also consider exposing the current method as-is in an alpha release or something, it if makes your life easier sooner :)

@seancarroll that is an awesome find and it would be a great addition for E2E tests in the future, but for unit tests I was thinking about something else, which...

I want to improve this crate's testability for both the crate and its users. I have created #71 to track the developments on this part.