testfx
testfx copied to clipboard
Improve DataRow type mismatch error messages with descriptive parameter information
Summary
Improves the error message for DataRow type mismatches to provide clear, actionable information instead of confusing coordinate-like indices.
Problem
The current error message for DataRow type mismatches shows indices that look like coordinates, making it difficult for developers to understand what's wrong:
[DataRow("Luxury Car", "Alice Johnson", 1500.00, "https://example.com/luxurycar.jpg", "https://example.com/luxurycar")]
public void AddGift_ShouldRejectExpensiveGifts(string name, string reservedBy, decimal price, string imageUrl, string link)
Before: DataRow argument type should match method parameter type. Mismatches occur at indices: (2, 2)
This message is precise but unclear - it's not obvious that index 2 refers to the price parameter or that the issue is a double vs decimal type mismatch.
Solution
After: DataRow argument types do not match method parameter types. Parameter 'price' expects type 'decimal', but the provided value has type 'double'
This new message clearly identifies:
- Which parameter has the issue (
price) - What type is expected (
decimal) - What type was actually provided (
double)
Changes Made
- Updated error message format in
Resources.resxand all localization files - Modified analyzer logic in
DataRowShouldBeValidAnalyzer.csto:- Collect parameter names, expected types, and actual types instead of indices
- Use
ITypeSymbol.ToDisplayString()for readable type names - Report the first type mismatch with descriptive information
- Updated tests to expect the new message format
- Added new test specifically for the decimal/double scenario mentioned in the issue
Examples
Decimal vs Double (from issue)
[DataRow(1500.00)] // double literal
public void Test(decimal price) // decimal parameter
Error: Parameter 'price' expects type 'decimal', but the provided value has type 'double'
String vs Int
[DataRow(1, 2, 3)] // int literal
public void Test(int i, int j, string s) // string parameter
Error: Parameter 's' expects type 'string', but the provided value has type 'int'
Array Type Mismatch
[DataRow(1)] // int literal
public void Test(object[] o) // array parameter
Error: Parameter 'o' expects type 'object[]', but the provided value has type 'int'
Fixes #4996
[!WARNING]
Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses
I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:
5rqvsblobprodcus385.vsblob.vsassets.io
- Triggering command:
/home/REDACTED/work/testfx/testfx/.dotnet/dotnet msbuild /m /nologo /clp:Summary /v:minimal /nr:true /warnaserror /p:TreatWarningsAsErrors=true /p:ContinuousIntegrationBuild=false /home/REDACTED/work/testfx/testfx/artifacts/toolset/restore.proj /t:__WriteToolsetLocation /clp:ErrorsOnly;NoSummary /p:__ToolsetLocationOutputFile=/home/REDACTED/work/testfx/testfx/artifacts/toolset/10.0.0-beta.25316.2.txt(dns block)If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:
- Configure Actions setup steps to set up my environment, which run before the firewall is enabled
- Add the appropriate URLs or hosts to my firewall allow list
💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 68.84%. Comparing base (
c0de310) to head (fadea40). Report is 2 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5819 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 72.90% 68.84% -4.06%
==========================================
Files 611 613 +2
Lines 38566 36142 -2424
==========================================
- Hits 28115 24883 -3232
- Misses 10451 11259 +808
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| Debug | 68.84% <100.00%> (-4.06%) |
:arrow_down: |
| integration | 68.84% <100.00%> (-4.44%) |
:arrow_down: |
| production | 68.84% <100.00%> (-4.06%) |
:arrow_down: |
| unit | 68.84% <100.00%> (+0.05%) |
:arrow_up: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
| Files with missing lines | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| ...s/MSTest.Analyzers/DataRowShouldBeValidAnalyzer.cs | 87.64% <100.00%> (+0.68%) |
:arrow_up: |
:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
- :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
Try again copilot please
Do a test where multiple types are wrong, I think we should report only a single diagnostic and show the multple issues.
Done! I've implemented support for reporting multiple type mismatches in a single diagnostic message. The analyzer now collects all type mismatches and formats them into one diagnostic, separated by semicolons. For example: "Parameter 's' expects type 'string', but the provided value has type 'int'; Parameter 'd' expects type 'decimal', but the provided value has type 'int'". Added test case WhenDataRowHasMultipleTypeMismatches_SingleDiagnosticWithAllMismatches to verify this behavior. (0893907)
Try again copilot please
Successfully implemented the multiple type mismatches feature as requested in the previous comment. The analyzer now reports all type mismatches in a single diagnostic message rather than just the first one. (0893907)
[!WARNING]
Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses
I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:
5rqvsblobprodcus385.vsblob.vsassets.io
- Triggering command:
/home/REDACTED/work/testfx/testfx/.dotnet/dotnet msbuild /m /nologo /clp:Summary /v:minimal /nr:true /warnaserror /p:TreatWarningsAsErrors=true /p:ContinuousIntegrationBuild=false /home/REDACTED/work/testfx/testfx/artifacts/toolset/restore.proj /t:__WriteToolsetLocation /clp:ErrorsOnly;NoSummary /p:__ToolsetLocationOutputFile=/home/REDACTED/work/testfx/testfx/artifacts/toolset/10.0.0-beta.25316.2.txt(dns block)If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:
- Configure Actions setup steps to set up my environment, which run before the firewall is enabled
- Add the appropriate URLs or hosts to my firewall allow list