TypeScript
TypeScript copied to clipboard
Unable to access ServiceWorkerGlobalScope via `self.`
Since ServiceWorker related types sit in lib.webworker.d.ts, webworker lib need to be added to tsconfig.json.
{
"compilerOptions": {
"lib": [
"es2017",
"webworker"
]
}
}
But in current lib.webworker.d.ts, it declare var self: WorkerGlobalScope;, so we can't access ServiceWorkerGlobalScope via self.
TypeScript Version: 2.2.1
Expected behavior:
Can access ServiceWorkerGlobalScope via self.(like self.clients)
Actual behavior:
Access with error.

I have not found references in the sepec that self is of type ServiceWorkerGlobalScope.
I think clients should be available as a global variable though. i.e.:
declare var clients: Clients;
PRs welcomed. You can find more information about contributing lib.d.ts fixes at https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#contributing-libdts-fixes.
self property will return browsing context object. And according to MDN, sometimes return ServiceWorkerGlobalScope object. See following docs.
- https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Window/self
- https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/WorkerGlobalScope/self
I'm wondering whether we need to separate typings of web worker and service worker for the following reasons:
- If we put all worker typings into one lib, How can we prevent web worker user using service worker methods and properties like
clients. closeis not accessible in service worker, how can we omitcloseinServiceWorderGlobalScope?- We can access service worker methods and properties like
clientsregistrationviaselfin Chrome 57.(Just like theselfin Window)

FYI https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/11781
As a workaround I am currently doing this
(function (self: ServiceWorkerGlobalScope) {
//Service worker contents...
})(<ServiceWorkerGlobalScope>self);
Anyone have a better solution?
Any progress about this? It's kinda sad that we cannot use Service Workers alongside Type Script.
I did this:
const { clients, addEventListener, skipWaiting, registration } = self as ServiceWorkerGlobalScope;
Note you need "webworker" lib with 2.4
Adding declare var self: ServiceWorkerGlobalScope; on top of my service worker implementation fixes that
@abarisain I came up with your solution as well but it fails with following error
Variable 'self' must be of type 'WorkerGlobalScope', but here has type 'ServiceWorkerGlobalScope'.
How did you configure your tsconfig.json to have it working? Thanks!
The workaround I found was:
const _self = self as ServiceWorkerGlobalScope;
...but you then have to use _self everywhere :(
Are you using the latest typescript version?
Turns out since I commented, my needs evolved: I needed to define new variables on the global scope. Since my project mixes a lot of environments, I also had to have many sub .tsconfig files.
Here is what works for me:
/// <reference path='../../../node_modules/typescript/lib/lib.es6.d.ts' />
/// <reference path='../../../node_modules/typescript/lib/lib.webworker.d.ts' />
/// <reference path="../../types/contextual/serviceworker-patches.d.ts" />
import { foo } from './bar'
declare var self: MyWorkerGlobalScope;
interface MyWorkerGlobalScope extends ServiceWorkerGlobalScope {
handleForwardedEvent?: (eventName: string, event: Event) => Promise<void>;
}
serviceworker-patches.d.ts has some other patches to fix the incomplete definitions
here is my tsconfig
{
"extends": "../tsconfig.json",
"compilerOptions": {
"lib": ["es6"]
}
}
(the extend part is irrelevant, as all options defined in my base tsconfig are for other stuff)
Thanks for your very fast answer :)
I was stucked with 2.3.4 for other parts of the project but switching to 2.5.2 did not solve my compile error. I am always very confused with the triple-slash thing... and how it relates to adding libs in tsconfig.json
"lib": [
"webworker",
"es2016"
],
Nevermind, I will remain with my trick... it does the job as well... Hopefully, I will eventually understand those nasty typing issues... not speaking about how to tell the IDE that this file/folder is a service worker while the rest is in the context of Window etc... But this is more a debate for stackoverflow than this issues database.
The triple slashes are exactly how I tell that a file is a service worker :) it overrides every "lib" entry, but it's quite a dirty hack. I think you should isolate your worker in its own subfolder
Here is what worked for me:
- in
tsconfig.json:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"lib": [
"es6",
"webworker",
"dom"
]
}
}
- in the service worker:
import { } from ".";
declare var self: ServiceWorkerGlobalScope;
Not sure why the empty import is required :man_shrugging:
@Tetr4
Not sure why the empty import is required
I assume to mark file as a module. Without import/export statements TS doesn't mark file as a module.
@Tetr4 using an empty import caused an error for me:
Cannot find module '.'.
Adding export default null instead of import { } from "." in the service worker silenced the error.
@Tetr4 I got errors using your approach as I then got duplicated references between dom and webworker.
I ended up having to build a referenced tsconfig.json with two library configs (kind of like this), which seemed to work ok, but then with export default null at the top, that was copied into my JavaScript output as exports.__esModule and caused errors during registration.
So, I still have some configuration issue, but I'm pretty close.
I'm having related issues with this.
- I'm working on a JS project with vscode/typescript
checkjslinting. - I tried using
typings-serviceworker, but it caused all my other non-service-worker files to change scope. - I've created a reduced test-case, would be amazing if someone could look at it.
https://github.com/wilsonpage/vscode-scope-test-case
Piecing together several comments in here, this is all I ended up needing:
- Include
webworkerlib in tsconfig:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"lib": ["dom", "webworker"]
}
}
- Redeclare
selfand export null in service worker file:
export default null;
declare var self: ServiceWorkerGlobalScope;
I found multiple config files and installing npm packages not necessary (or even helpful).
It feels like TypeScript needs to break the various worker types apart in its definitions. This isn't just a service worker issue, it's an issue for other contexts that have a different global, like shared workers & the various worklets.
Either that, or there should be a way to declare which interface is the global.
The various self hacks in this thread only work for references to self. You've still got incorrect types for the global.
self is used in multiple works, so TypeScript may need to specify in the configuration which files refer to which worker types .
The workaround described in this issue doesn't appear to work anymore in TypeScript 4.1 because it actually puts the export statement into the build output now, which fails evaluation in the browser.
In TypeScript 4.1+ it seems you can still get it working if you something like this
/// <reference lib="webworker" />
//@ts-ignore
sw=self;
declare var sw: ServiceWorkerGlobalScope;
at the top of your file, and then use sw whenever you need to use self. But it's a very ugly workaround.
With TypeScript 4.3, I now have the following:
/// <reference no-default-lib="true"/>
/// <reference lib="es2020" />
/// <reference lib="WebWorker" />
const sw = self as ServiceWorkerGlobalScope & typeof globalThis
The no-default-lib is needed to workaround the fact that self is also a Window and not castable.
Of course, now, you must use sw and not self :disappointed:
@Tetr4 Thanks a lot, that fixed it for me but no need to import with import { } from ".";
Using the lib Triple-Slash Directive /// <reference lib="WebWorker" /> makes ServiceWorkerGlobalScope available
and no-default-lib Triple-Slash Directive /// <reference no-default-lib="true"/> disables the DOM library as Glandos points out:
The
no-defaul-libis needed to workaround the fact thatselfis also aWindowand not castable.
However, if I use these directives in my webworker's source file, other files in my project (and inside node_modules) choke because they can no longer find the DOM stuff (Window, HTMLCollection, document, etc...)
The docs say:
The compiler performs a preprocessing pass on input files to resolve all triple-slash reference directives The process starts with a set of root files; these are the file names specified on the command-line or in the files list in the tsconfig.json file. These root files are preprocessed in the same order they are specified. Before a file is added to the list, all triple-slash references in it are processed, and their targets included.
Looks like using these directives is global, therefore pretty much equivalent to setting lib in tsconfig.json,
which is unexpected. I expected the Triple-Slash directive to be local to the file in which it is written.
Related: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/20595
Possible solution: https://joshuatz.com/posts/2021/strongly-typed-service-workers/#solution-b-tsconfig-libs
Here is a good workaround, with typescript 4.5.5
sw.ts
/// <reference lib="webworker" />
declare const self: ServiceWorkerGlobalScope
Does anybody have a JS only solution (jsdoc syntax)?
I got as far as:
/// <reference lib="WebWorker" />
/** @type {ServiceWorkerGlobalScope} */
const context = /** @type {unknown} */ (self);
But I'd have to change all references to self. I can't manage to enforce it on self.
/// <reference no-default-lib="true"/>
/// <reference lib="WebWorker" />
/** @type {ServiceWorkerGlobalScope} */
const self = globalThis.self;
Would yield Cannot redeclare block-scoped variable 'self'.ts(2451).
If I try just importing the the lib, It can't find it:
/** @type {import('typescript/lib/lib.webworker').ServiceWorkerGlobalScope} */
const self = globalThis.self;
File '/home/user/project/node_modules/typescript/lib/lib.webworker.d.ts' is not a module.ts(2306)
@clshortfuse JSDoc isn't related to TypeScript and isn't Microsoft's responsibility. Regarding your issue with JS only (JSDoc), try asking JSDoc instead. https://github.com/jsdoc/jsdoc
@soryy708 You're mistaken. Typescript supports either TS files or JSDocs syntax. In fact, it's part of the official proposal.
https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/jsdoc-supported-types.html
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations