Magnus Hagdorn

> JORS JORS did spring to my mind as well. I think that might be quite a good match, not sure what the impact is, if that is something we...

I think the word count of perspectives is limited to 2500 words: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/s/other-article-types

I don't think we should change the term "Research Software Engineer". It was difficult to come up with a succinct name that reflects the scope of the role. It is...

I also like the subtitle idea of @juckel. I am slightly concerned however, that it could be read as how to progress from scientist who codes to full-time SE rather...

what about _Foundational Competencies and Responsibilities of a Research Software Engineer - for both scientists who code and software engineers in research_ although we don't want to restrict the readership...

> _Foundational Competencies and Responsibilities of a Research Software Engineer - for both scientists who develop software and software engineers supporting scientists_ cool, I like that. This seems to be...

I wrote a few sentences on critical engagement with tools. I feel well out of my depth here. So please feel free to chip in.

When I was an undergrad I did a year of computational physics as part of my geophysics degree. This is really what set me on the path of becoming an...

I think so. I agree with @MakisH, an RSE should have a home domain. Obviously a CS student might decide to become an RSE.

> We got a succesful reply by BSSW [Identifying the Foundational Competencies of a Research Software Engineer.pdf](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/17853259/Identifying.the.Foundational.Competencies.of.a.Research.Software.Engineer.pdf) Putting the pdf here, since it's behind a password protected interface. Excellent! I...