Maximilian Roos

This was subsumed by #4293

This would be nice to bump as it looks like it fixes a few issues we encountered — e.g. footnotes. But I think we need to wait for https://github.com/Byron/pulldown-cmark-to-cmark to...

Yes! This was an issue with doing right associativity. I discussed it on a call with @aljazerzen and he explained a way of doing it. He also pushed a branch...

(quick message to say thanks for the issue @colemanbroad — the nested grouping still needs some work)

Hi @maelp , good questions, thanks for opening an issue. Check out https://prql-lang.org/book/reference/syntax/keywords.html — these are solvable with backticks and `this.` respectively: ``` from `cse(2024,1,5)` aggregate { sum this.time }...

Ah, so we want literally `FROM cse(2024,1,5)` and not the quoted `FROM "cse(2024,1,5)"`. In that case, I think we do need to use the `from s"SELECT * FROM cse(2024, 1,...

The `-10` needs to be parenthesized... ```elm let checkTemps = numWeeks minCellTemp maxCellTemp maxBMSTemp -> ( from (recent_cse) derive { min_temp_cells = s"LEAST(value.temperature_front, value.temperature_back)", max_temp_cells = s"GREATEST(value.temperature_front, value.temperature_back)", max_temp_bms =...

> would be interesting if we could have something like this! Or allow macros and duckdb functions in PRQL or something We could have something very very simple like `duckdb_macro...

> @max-sixty would there be a way to show the "correct" error in those cases? It's definitely possible. I'd say it's harder than I thought it would be when I...

> (another small nitpick: why not using the same "->" for case and function, and introducing another symbol like "=>" ?) FYI there was some discussion on this in a...