Matt Garrish

> but that does not mean all entries that come from EDUPUB are labelled as a draft Every new term created by the edupub group is a draft, yes, but...

> we remove all entries that are marked as ... 'deprecated'? Ya, that's a tough call. We used to have a ["revision policy" section](https://web.archive.org/web/20160826202319/https://idpf.github.io/epub-vocabs/structure/#h_revisionpolicy) in the IDPF version that said...

Ya, I'll put something together based on what we've discussed so far so everyone can review the changes. I'll probably keep the first set I listed above for the first...

Pull request #2731 requires that the date be one of the following formats: - YYYY-MM-DD - YYYY-MM - YYYY But before merging that pull request, are we sure we want...

The proposal is now similar to the recommendation for the dc:date element: > It is REQUIRED that the date string conform to [iso8601-1], particularly the subset expressed in W3C Date...

> namely, there is no way to query the EPUB file to determine if it is a version that requires this MUST, or if it is an earlier version that...

Another oddity is why xsd is a reserved prefix in the package document. I had to go back to 3.0.1 to find an example of it being redundantly used to...

An additional comment, the folks at editeur were able to get this redirect working again: http://www.editeur.org/ONIX/book/codelists/current.html# But it's not their preferred choice for an identifier anymore. I don't know if...

> I am not sure that 'just' removing it works for that. The addition of the prism prefix came about because IdeaAlliance had started trying to create a fork of...

> I presume that you meant the additional column in the table; yes, that sounds like a good approach. Right, we can at least explain in plain English what these...