Mattan S. Ben-Shachar

Looking at the `posterior` code, looks like its: ```R I.05

> Would be really nice if BayesFactor and INLA would also update to work with the posterior S3 generics... Unlikely... That's what we're here for! I still cannot wrap my...

These "adjustments" are for the **prior *odds*** between pairs/sets of hypotheses (not for any of the measures of evidence). How would you like to see these implemented? (Personally not a...

I don't think this is an avenue worth perusing (see previous comment about defining others' priors). But if *you* are interested in such methods of default priors, you might also...

Yup, I'm def more in favor of those. (The ones discussed here are for independent tests, or pairwise model-less tests...)

At that point, the vignette is comparing the `bayesfactor_inclusion` function with the similar functionality provided by JASP. To do this (in a new example), the `BayesFactor` pkg is used as...

> Also, it would be helpful to have comment on how the various outputs from BF_inclusion() relate to the four items returned by summary(BF_ToothGrowth). The functionality is explained in the...

Weird that is doesn't have a BIC method :/

Seems like the issue is that both `mgcv::gamm` and `gamm4::gamm4` return a list of models (the LMM and the GAM). While `mgcv::gamm` is of class `c("gamm", "list"), `gamm4::gamm4` is only...

So you're response to this unsolved issue it to tag another unsolved issue?? 😅