Create Osiris scripts

[Harrietbrown]

Description of work. This PR create Powder Diffraction Scripts for the OSIRIS Scripts The ultimate goal of these scripts is that they be able to:

1. Sum multiple runs together accounting for OSIRIS's drange system for smooth continuous curves.
2. Inteligent run number control
3. output different PDF data forms (d-spacing by default)
4. supports masking of bad detectors
5. vanadium correction
6. multiple scattering correction
7. absorbtion correction

Report to: Sanghamitra

To test: Contact me for calibration files

from isis_powder.osiris import Osiris

osiris_focus = Osiris(user_name="Calib",
                      output_directory=r"C:\Users\wey38795\Documents\pr_test_files\OsirisCalibrationFiles\output",   #directory above cycle number 
                      config_file=r"C:\Users\wey38795\Documents\pr_test_files\OsirisCalibrationFiles\Calibration.yaml",
                      calibration_directory=r"C:\Users\wey38795\Documents\pr_test_files\OsirisCalibrationFiles\Calibration_files",
                      calibration_mapping_file=r"C:\Users\wey38795\Documents\pr_test_files\OsirisCalibrationFiles\Calibration_files\osiris_run_mapping.yaml")

osiris_focus.run_diffraction_focusing(run_number="119977-119988",
                                      merge_drange=False, 
                                      subtract_empty_instrument=True, 
                                      vanadium_normalisation=False)

Fixes #33666

---

Reviewer

Please comment on the following (full description):

Code Review

• Is the code of an acceptable quality?
• Does the code conform to the coding standards?
• Are the unit tests small and test the class in isolation?
• If there is GUI work does it follow the GUI standards?
• If there are changes in the release notes then do they describe the changes appropriately?
• Are the release notes saved in a separate file, using Issue or PR number for file name and in the correct location?

Functional Tests

• Do changes function as described? Add comments below that describe the tests performed?
• Do the changes handle unexpected situations, e.g. bad input?
• Has the relevant (user and developer) documentation been added/updated?

Does everything look good? Mark the review as Approve. A member of @mantidproject/gatekeepers will take care of it.