Manuel Astudillo

@gurbaj5124871 I am not 100% sure. Maybe somebody else from this thread could verify it before we close.

I marked it as an enhancement.

Although I agree it is an inconsistent behaviour there are several workarounds for this so it is not very high prioritized.

@pascalprat you should not need any workarounds. The progress is reported as an event and that is they way it should be handled in your code. In a distributed system...

Sorry for the tremendously late response here. The PR looks fine, merging now.

moveToComplete is a private method so it should not be used. We would need to have a separate method for forcing a job to be cancelled, in order to do...

not sure yet how it will come out I need to think more about it.

Thanks for reporting this issue. As I do not consider this a high prio issue it will probably not be fixed very soon, but of course, PRs are welcomed.

Why do you need to know if it has been added or ignored, the result should be the same in any case.

Seems like you can solve that more robustly by 1) having 2 queues, one for perform action A and another for giving feedback, or 2) doing action A and giving...