results on cifar100

[apeterswu]

Hi,

Thanks for the great work and released code. I have tried to run several times on cifar100+ with the DenseNet-BC (L=190, k=40), but it's hard to reproduce the result 17.18. My training script looks like this, simply replace the dataset to be cifar100 and without the efficient setting: python demo.py --depth 190 --growth_rate 40 --save ckpts --batch_size 64 --valid_size 0 The best result I got is about 17.3x, did you think this result is also acceptable or did I miss anything? Thanks a lot.

[liuzhuang13]

I think that is totally acceptable, sometimes the variance on CIFAR-100 can be even up to 1% (when error around ~25% ).