trafficstars

Issue

resolve:

Why is this change needed?

What would you like reviewers to focus on?

Testing Verification

What was done

🤖 Generated by PR Agent at a48cc5bba2932b0eff434328c3887f90bd0298f8

Added a new sample field to the PRCommit model in schema.prisma.
Enhanced the database schema for better data representation.

Detailed Changes

Relevant files

Enhancement

schema.prisma

Added `sample` field to `PRCommit` model

frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma

Added a new sample field of type String to the PRCommit model.

Enhanced the schema for improved data structure.

+2/-1

Additional Notes

Need help?
Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.
Check out the documentation for more information.

Mar 19 '25 11:03 NoritakaIkeda

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: a47ccbbafdd68e2018f0d84499c9f6bf0c349067

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Mar 19 '25 11:03 changeset-bot[bot]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
liam-app	🛑 Canceled (Inspect)			Apr 4, 2025 0:27am
liam-erd-sample	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Apr 4, 2025 0:27am

4 Skipped Deployments

Name	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
liam-docs	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Apr 4, 2025 0:27am
test-liam-app	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)		Apr 4, 2025 0:27am
test-liam-docs	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)		Apr 4, 2025 0:27am
test-liam-erd-sample	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)		Apr 4, 2025 0:27am

Mar 19 '25 11:03 vercel[bot]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

(Review updated until commit https://github.com/liam-hq/liam/commit/a47ccbbafdd68e2018f0d84499c9f6bf0c349067)

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

Required Field

The new sample field is added as a required field without a default value, which may cause migration issues for existing records in the database.

  sample        String
}

Missing Documentation

The purpose of the new sample field is not documented with a comment, making it unclear what this field represents or how it should be used.

  sample        String
}

Mar 19 '25 11:03 qodo-merge-for-open-source[bot]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Latest suggestions up to a47ccbb

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Impact
Possible issue	Make new field optional The newly added `sample` field is required (non-nullable) which will cause migration failures for existing records. Make this field optional or provide a default value to ensure backward compatibility with existing data. frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma [183-190] `model PRCommit { id BigInt @id @default(autoincrement()) @db.BigInt pullRequestId BigInt @db.BigInt pullRequest PullRequest @relation(fields: [pullRequestId], references: [id]) commitHash String committedAt DateTime - sample String + sample String? }` [ ] Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10 __ Why: This suggestion addresses a critical migration issue. Adding a required field without a default value would cause migration failures for existing records, as noted in the migration patterns document. Making the field optional with the '?' modifier is essential for backward compatibility.	High
[ ] More

Previous suggestions

Suggestions up to commit a47ccbb

Category	Suggestion	Impact
Possible issue	Make new field optional The newly added `sample` field is required (non-nullable) which will cause migration failures for existing records. Make this field optional or provide a default value to ensure backward compatibility with existing data. frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma [183-190] `model PRCommit { id BigInt @id @default(autoincrement()) @db.BigInt pullRequestId BigInt @db.BigInt pullRequest PullRequest @relation(fields: [pullRequestId], references: [id]) commitHash String committedAt DateTime - sample String + sample String? }` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a critical migration issue. Adding a required field without a default value would cause migration failures for existing records, as mentioned in the migration patterns document. Making the field optional with the '?' modifier is an appropriate solution that aligns with the project's migration guidelines.	High

Suggestions up to commit 8289848

Category	Suggestion	Impact
Possible issue	Make new field optional The newly added `sample` field lacks constraints and is required by default, which could break existing data. Consider making it optional or providing a default value to maintain backward compatibility with existing records. frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma [183-190] `model PRCommit { id BigInt @id @default(autoincrement()) @db.BigInt pullRequestId BigInt @db.BigInt pullRequest PullRequest @relation(fields: [pullRequestId], references: [id]) commitHash String committedAt DateTime - sample String + sample String? }` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a critical issue where adding a required field without a default value would break existing data. Making the field optional with the '?' modifier aligns with the schema context guidelines about not disrupting current functionality.	High

Suggestions up to commit a48cc5b

Category	Suggestion	Impact
Possible issue	Make new field optional The newly added `sample` field is required but doesn't have a default value. This could cause issues with existing data when migrating the database. Consider making it optional with a `?` modifier or providing a default value. frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma [183-190] `model PRCommit { id BigInt @id @default(autoincrement()) @db.BigInt pullRequestId BigInt @db.BigInt pullRequest PullRequest @relation(fields: [pullRequestId], references: [id]) commitHash String committedAt DateTime - sample String + sample String? }` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a critical database migration issue. Adding a required field without a default value would cause errors for existing records, so making it optional with the '?' modifier is an important fix to prevent database migration failures.	High

Suggestions up to commit a48cc5b

Category	Suggestion	Impact
Possible issue	Make new field optional The newly added `sample` field is required but doesn't have a default value. This could cause issues with existing data since all existing rows would need a value for this field. Consider making it optional with a `?` modifier or providing a default value. frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma [183-190] `model PRCommit { id BigInt @id @default(autoincrement()) @db.BigInt pullRequestId BigInt @db.BigInt pullRequest PullRequest @relation(fields: [pullRequestId], references: [id]) commitHash String committedAt DateTime - sample String + sample String? }` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a critical issue with the PR. Adding a required field without a default value would cause database migration failures for existing records. Making the field optional with the '?' modifier is an appropriate solution to prevent breaking changes.	High

Mar 19 '25 11:03 qodo-merge-for-open-source[bot]

The schema change you've provided involves a modification to the PRCommit model in a Prisma schema file. Specifically, a new field named sample of type String has been added to the model. Here’s a comprehensive review of the change:

Understanding the Context: The PRCommit model represents a commit associated with a pull request. It includes fields such as pullRequest, commitHash, and committedAt, which are essential for tracking commits in the context of pull requests. The addition of the sample field indicates an intention to store additional information related to each commit.
Field Addition: The new sample field is of type String, which provides flexibility in what kind of data can be stored. It is crucial to understand the purpose of this field:
- Purpose: Clarify what kind of information sample is meant to represent. Is it meant for comments, tags, or other metadata? Understanding its purpose will help ensure that the field is used appropriately in application logic.
- Data Integrity: If the sample field holds critical information, consider implementing constraints or validations to enforce data integrity (e.g., setting it to not null if it must always contain a value).
Impact on Existing Data: Since this is an addition rather than a modification of existing fields, it should not disrupt current data or existing functionality. However, it is essential to consider how this new field will be handled in the application:
- Default Value: If no value is provided for sample, it will default to null, which may be acceptable. If a default value is necessary to maintain consistency, this should be explicitly defined.
Migration Strategy: Depending on the database management system (DBMS) used, you may need to create a migration script to reflect this change in the database schema. Ensure that the migration is tested to confirm that it executes successfully without errors and that the sample field is correctly added.
Documentation: Update any relevant documentation to include the new field, explaining its purpose, usage, and any constraints associated with it. This is vital for maintaining clarity for future developers who may interact with the schema.
Testing: Implement unit and integration tests to ensure that the addition of the sample field does not introduce any regressions. Test scenarios where the field is populated and where it is left null to ensure that the application handles both cases gracefully.
Future Considerations: As the application evolves, reconsider the need for the sample field. If additional attributes related to commits are anticipated in the future, it might be beneficial to evaluate whether a more structured approach (e.g., a related model) is warranted.

In summary, the addition of the sample field to the PRCommit model is a straightforward enhancement that could provide valuable functionality, assuming its purpose is well-defined and implemented. Ensuring that proper documentation, testing, and migration strategies accompany this change will contribute to maintaining the integrity and usability of the database schema.

Migration URL: https://liam-app-git-staging-route-06-core.vercel.app/app/projects/4/migrations/4

Mar 19 '25 11:03 liam-migration-preview[bot]

The recent schema changes in the database design indicate a thoughtful approach towards enhancing the existing structure while considering the implications on current functionality. Below is a comprehensive review of the changes made:

Documentation Context Addition:
- The addition of documentation in docs/schemaContext emphasizes the importance of maintaining application stability when adding new fields. This is a positive step as it highlights the need for awareness regarding existing dependencies. It serves as a guideline for future schema changes, reminding developers to consider potential impacts on the application and its users.
- The introduction of constraints for critical new fields is also a sound practice. Establishing constraints to maintain data integrity and prevent null or invalid entries is essential in ensuring that the database remains reliable and that applications can function correctly without encountering unexpected errors due to missing or incorrect data.
Modification of PRCommit Model:
- In the frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma, the PRCommit model has been modified to include a new field, sample. This addition expands the model's capability, potentially allowing for richer data representation related to pull requests.
- The inclusion of a sample field should be evaluated concerning its necessity and impact. While it can provide valuable insights, it is crucial to ensure that this field does not introduce redundancy or complexity that may complicate data management. Additionally, it’s important to consider whether this field should have any constraints or default values to maintain data integrity. If the sample field is critical for functionality, ensuring it is not nullable could prevent issues in application logic where this field is referenced.
General Considerations:
- The schema changes reflect a good practice of iterative improvement. However, it would be beneficial to include migration scripts or documentation on how existing data should be handled with the introduction of the new field. This is particularly important for databases that already have existing records, as there may be a need to populate the new field or handle it appropriately to avoid null values in production.
- Additionally, it would be prudent to conduct thorough testing after implementing these changes. Unit tests and integration tests should be updated or created to cover new scenarios introduced by the sample field. This ensures that any changes do not inadvertently break existing functionality.
Conclusion:
- Overall, the schema changes demonstrate a proactive approach to evolving the database structure while being mindful of existing dependencies and data integrity. The emphasis on documentation and constraints is commendable and should continue to be a focal point for future modifications. As the schema evolves, continuous attention to the implications of each change on existing functionality will be key to maintaining a robust and reliable database architecture.

Migration URL: http://localhost:3000/app/migrations/2

Mar 31 '25 10:03 liam-migration-local[bot]

Review of Schema Changes

The recent changes to the schema involved adding a new field 'sample' to the 'PRCommit' model, along with some documentation updates. While the intention seems to enhance functionality, there are several concerns:

Identified Issues

Data Integrity: The new 'sample' field does not have any constraints, which might allow null or invalid entries. It’s crucial to establish these constraints to maintain data integrity, especially if the field is critical for some functionality.
Migration Safety: Adding a field to an existing model can lead to issues if existing codebases rely on the previous structure. A thorough review of the dependencies is necessary to ensure that the new field does not disrupt current functionalities.

Recommendations

For Data Integrity: Implement constraints on the 'sample' field to ensure it meets the required data quality standards. Consider making it a non-nullable field if it's essential.
For Migration Safety: Review all parts of the codebase that interact with the 'PRCommit' model to verify that they can accommodate the new field without causing errors or unexpected behavior.

In conclusion, while the schema changes aim to enhance the system, proper safeguards and reviews are necessary to ensure that current functionality remains intact and data integrity is maintained.

Migration URL: http://localhost:3000/app/migrations/1

Apr 02 '25 11:04 liam-migration-local[bot]

Review of Schema Changes

The recent changes to the schema involved adding a new field 'sample' to the 'PRCommit' model, alongside some documentation updates. While the intention seems to enhance functionality, significant concerns need addressing:

Identified Issues

Data Integrity: The new 'sample' field lacks constraints, potentially allowing null or invalid entries. Establishing these constraints is crucial to ensure data integrity, especially if the field is critical for some functionality.
Migration Safety: Adding a required field without a default value can lead to migration issues, particularly for existing records. A thorough review of the codebase is necessary to ensure compatibility with the new field.

Recommendations

For Data Integrity: Implement constraints on the 'sample' field to enforce data quality standards. If the field is essential, consider making it non-nullable or providing a default value.
For Migration Safety: Review all code interacting with the 'PRCommit' model to verify it can accommodate the new field without errors or unexpected behavior. Consider making the field optional or providing a default value to mitigate potential issues.

In conclusion, while the schema changes aim to enhance the system, proper safeguards and reviews are necessary to ensure current functionality remains intact and data integrity is preserved.

Migration URL: https://liam-erd-web.vercel.app/app/migrations/166

ER Diagrams:

View ERD for frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma: https://liam-erd-web.vercel.app/app/projects/6/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/schema/frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma

Apr 04 '25 10:04 liam-migration[bot]

Review of Schema Changes

The recent changes to the schema involved adding a new field 'sample' to the 'PRCommit' model. While the intention seems to enhance functionality, there are significant concerns that need addressing:

Identified Issues

Data Integrity: The new 'sample' field lacks constraints, potentially allowing null or invalid entries. Establishing these constraints is crucial to ensure data integrity, especially if the field is critical for some functionality.
Migration Safety: Adding a required field without a default value can lead to migration issues, particularly for existing records. A thorough review of the codebase is necessary to ensure compatibility with the new field.

Recommendations

For Data Integrity: Implement constraints on the 'sample' field to enforce data quality standards. If the field is essential, consider making it non-nullable or providing a default value.
For Migration Safety: Review all code interacting with the 'PRCommit' model to verify it can accommodate the new field without errors or unexpected behavior. Consider making the field optional or providing a default value to mitigate potential issues.

In conclusion, while the schema changes aim to enhance the system, proper safeguards and reviews are necessary to ensure current functionality remains intact and data integrity is preserved.

Migration URL: http://localhost:3000/app/migrations/1

ER Diagrams:

View ERD for frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/1/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/schema/frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma

Apr 04 '25 10:04 liam-migration-local[bot]

CI Feedback 🧐

(Feedback updated until commit https://github.com/liam-hq/liam/commit/a47ccbbafdd68e2018f0d84499c9f6bf0c349067)

A test triggered by this PR failed. Here is an AI-generated analysis of the failure:

Action: e2e-tests (Mobile Safari)

Failed stage: Run e2e tests [❌]

Failed test name: [Mobile Safari] › tests/vrt/vrt.test.ts:24:5 › top

Failure summary:

The action failed because the Visual Regression Test (VRT) for "top" failed in the "Mobile Safari"
project. The test at line 25 in tests/vrt/vrt.test.ts failed because the screenshot comparison
detected differences:

3094 pixels (ratio 0.02 of all image pixels) were different between the expected and actual
screenshots

The test was retried 5 times but consistently failed with the same pixel difference

The failure occurred at the screenshot function call at line 11:22 in the VRT test file

Relevant error logs:

1:  ##[group]Operating System
2:  Ubuntu
...

172:  ##[endgroup]
173:  Node version file is not JSON file
174:  Resolved ./.node-version as 22.11.0
175:  Attempting to download 22.11.0...
176:  Acquiring 22.11.0 - x64 from https://github.com/actions/node-versions/releases/download/22.11.0-11593095476/node-22.11.0-linux-x64.tar.gz
177:  Extracting ...
178:  [command]/usr/bin/tar xz --strip 1 --warning=no-unknown-keyword --overwrite -C /home/runner/work/_temp/74d1e9a3-15ef-4e93-ab97-53138662fd5d -f /home/runner/work/_temp/d1c2b4eb-e76a-4158-8d2b-2efd2f395b74
179:  Adding to the cache ...
180:  ##[group]Environment details
181:  node: v22.11.0
182:  npm: 10.9.0
183:  yarn: 1.22.22
184:  ##[endgroup]
185:  [command]/home/runner/setup-pnpm/node_modules/.bin/pnpm store path --silent
186:  /home/runner/setup-pnpm/node_modules/.bin/store/v3
187:  ##[warning]Failed to restore: Failed to GetCacheEntryDownloadURL: Received non-retryable error: Failed request: (403) Forbidden: unable to access resource in current scope
188:  pnpm cache is not found
...

202:  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
203:  Progress: resolved 1721, reused 0, downloaded 147, added 146
204:  Progress: resolved 1721, reused 0, downloaded 250, added 241
205:  Progress: resolved 1721, reused 0, downloaded 397, added 395
206:  Progress: resolved 1721, reused 0, downloaded 535, added 530
207:  Progress: resolved 1721, reused 0, downloaded 562, added 554
208:  Progress: resolved 1721, reused 0, downloaded 601, added 595
209:  Progress: resolved 1721, reused 0, downloaded 681, added 671
210:  Progress: resolved 1721, reused 0, downloaded 864, added 865
211:  Progress: resolved 1721, reused 0, downloaded 978, added 979
212:  Progress: resolved 1721, reused 0, downloaded 1216, added 1228
213:  Progress: resolved 1721, reused 0, downloaded 1283, added 1288
214:  Progress: resolved 1721, reused 0, downloaded 1432, added 1449
215:  Progress: resolved 1721, reused 0, downloaded 1578, added 1586
216:  Progress: resolved 1721, reused 0, downloaded 1703, added 1721, done
217:  WARN  Failed to create bin at /home/runner/work/liam/liam/node_modules/.pnpm/node_modules/.bin/supabase. ENOENT: no such file or directory, open '/home/runner/work/liam/liam/node_modules/.pnpm/node_modules/supabase/bin/supabase'
218:  .../node_modules/core-js-pure postinstall$ node -e "try{require('./postinstall')}catch(e){}"
219:  .../node_modules/protobufjs postinstall$ node scripts/postinstall
220:  .../[email protected]/node_modules/esbuild postinstall$ node install.js
221:  .../node_modules/@depot/cli postinstall$ node install.js
222:  .../node_modules/@biomejs/biome postinstall$ node scripts/postinstall.js
223:  .../node_modules/core-js-pure postinstall: Done
224:  .../[email protected]/node_modules/esbuild postinstall: Done
225:  .../node_modules/protobufjs postinstall: Done
226:  .../node_modules/@biomejs/biome postinstall: Done
227:  .../[email protected]/node_modules/sharp install$ node install/check
228:  .../node_modules/@depot/cli postinstall: Done
229:  .../node_modules/@prisma/engines postinstall$ node scripts/postinstall.js
230:  .../node_modules/@sentry/cli postinstall$ node ./scripts/install.js
231:  .../node_modules/@sentry/cli postinstall: Done
232:  .../node_modules/@prisma/engines postinstall$ node scripts/postinstall.js
233:  WARN  Failed to create bin at /home/runner/work/liam/liam/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected]/node_modules/supabase/node_modules/.bin/supabase. ENOENT: no such file or directory, open '/home/runner/work/liam/liam/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected]/node_modules/supabase/bin/supabase'
234:  .../node_modules/supabase postinstall$ node scripts/postinstall.js
...

246:  .../node_modules/supabase postinstall: Installed Supabase CLI successfully
247:  .../node_modules/supabase postinstall: Done
248:  .../node_modules/style-dictionary postinstall$ patch-package
249:  .../node_modules/prisma preinstall$ node scripts/preinstall-entry.js
250:  .../node_modules/prisma preinstall: Done
251:  .../node_modules/style-dictionary postinstall: patch-package 8.0.0
252:  .../node_modules/style-dictionary postinstall: Applying patches...
253:  .../node_modules/style-dictionary postinstall: No patch files found
254:  .../node_modules/style-dictionary postinstall: Done
255:  .../node_modules/@prisma/client postinstall$ node scripts/postinstall.js
256:  .../node_modules/@prisma/client postinstall: prisma:warn We could not find your Prisma schema in the default locations (see: https://pris.ly/d/prisma-schema-location).
257:  .../node_modules/@prisma/client postinstall: If you have a Prisma schema file in a custom path, you will need to run
258:  .../node_modules/@prisma/client postinstall: `prisma generate --schema=./path/to/your/schema.prisma` to generate Prisma Client.
259:  .../node_modules/@prisma/client postinstall: If you do not have a Prisma schema file yet, you can ignore this message.
260:  .../node_modules/@prisma/client postinstall: Done
261:  WARN  Failed to create bin at /home/runner/work/liam/liam/frontend/apps/erd-sample/node_modules/.bin/liam. ENOENT: no such file or directory, open '/home/runner/work/liam/liam/frontend/packages/cli/dist-cli/bin/cli.js'
262:  devDependencies:
263:  + @changesets/cli 2.27.10
264:  + @changesets/get-github-info 0.6.0
265:  + @changesets/types 6.0.0
266:  + @turbo/gen 2.1.2
267:  + syncpack 13.0.0
268:  + turbo 2.1.2
269:  + vercel 41.4.0
270:  frontend/apps/docs postinstall$ fumadocs-mdx
271:  frontend/apps/docs postinstall: [MDX] types generated
272:  frontend/apps/docs postinstall: Done
273:  frontend/apps/app postinstall$ cp ../../packages/db-structure/node_modules/@ruby/prism/src/prism.wasm prism.wasm
274:  frontend/apps/app postinstall: Done
275:  WARN  Failed to create bin at /home/runner/work/liam/liam/frontend/apps/erd-sample/node_modules/.bin/liam. ENOENT: no such file or directory, open '/home/runner/work/liam/liam/frontend/apps/erd-sample/node_modules/@liam-hq/cli/dist-cli/bin/cli.js'
276:  Done in 19.1s
...

278:  with:
279:  path: ~/.cache/ms-playwright
280:  key: playwright-Linux-4eae13e04f687f8789f94b87ed7a78383da782b768a53692cd0956a990f45bfa
281:  restore-keys: playwright-Linux-
282:  
283:  enableCrossOsArchive: false
284:  fail-on-cache-miss: false
285:  lookup-only: false
286:  save-always: false
287:  env:
288:  CI: true
289:  URL: https://liam-i5j6v7o4i-route-06-core.vercel.app
290:  ENVIRONMENT: Preview – liam-app
291:  PNPM_HOME: /home/runner/setup-pnpm/node_modules/.bin
292:  ##[endgroup]
293:  [warning]Event Validation Error: The event type deployment_status is not supported because it's not tied to a branch or tag ref.
294:  ##[group]Run pnpm exec playwright install --with-deps
...

1537:  |■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■        |  90% of 2.3 MiB
1538:  |■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■| 100% of 2.3 MiB
1539:  FFMPEG playwright build v1011 downloaded to /home/runner/.cache/ms-playwright/ffmpeg-1011
1540:  ##[group]Run pnpm exec playwright test --project="Mobile Safari"
1541:  [36;1mpnpm exec playwright test --project="Mobile Safari"[0m
1542:  shell: /usr/bin/bash -e {0}
1543:  env:
1544:  CI: true
1545:  URL: https://liam-i5j6v7o4i-route-06-core.vercel.app
1546:  ENVIRONMENT: Preview – liam-app
1547:  PNPM_HOME: /home/runner/setup-pnpm/node_modules/.bin
1548:  ##[endgroup]
1549:  Running 17 tests using 1 worker
1550:  °°°·°······°°°°°×××××F
1551:  1) [Mobile Safari] › tests/vrt/vrt.test.ts:24:5 › top ────────────────────────────────────────────
1552:  Error: [2mexpect([22m[31mpage[39m[2m).[22mtoHaveScreenshot[2m([22m[32mexpected[39m[2m)[22m
1553:  3094 pixels (ratio 0.02 of all image pixels) are different.
...

1576:  12 | }
1577:  13 |
1578:  14 | interface TargetPage {
1579:  at screenshot (/home/runner/work/liam/liam/frontend/packages/e2e/tests/vrt/vrt.test.ts:11:22)
1580:  at /home/runner/work/liam/liam/frontend/packages/e2e/tests/vrt/vrt.test.ts:25:3
1581:  attachment #1: top-1-expected.png (image/png) ──────────────────────────────────────────────────
1582:  tests/vrt/vrt.test.ts-snapshots/top-1-Mobile-Safari-linux.png
1583:  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1584:  attachment #2: top-1-actual.png (image/png) ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1585:  test-results/vrt-vrt-top-Mobile-Safari/top-1-actual.png
1586:  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1587:  attachment #3: top-1-diff.png (image/png) ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1588:  test-results/vrt-vrt-top-Mobile-Safari/top-1-diff.png
1589:  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1590:  Retry #1 ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1591:  Error: [2mexpect([22m[31mpage[39m[2m).[22mtoHaveScreenshot[2m([22m[32mexpected[39m[2m)[22m
1592:  3094 pixels (ratio 0.02 of all image pixels) are different.
...

1620:  attachment #1: top-1-expected.png (image/png) ──────────────────────────────────────────────────
1621:  tests/vrt/vrt.test.ts-snapshots/top-1-Mobile-Safari-linux.png
1622:  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1623:  attachment #2: top-1-actual.png (image/png) ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1624:  test-results/vrt-vrt-top-Mobile-Safari-retry1/top-1-actual.png
1625:  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1626:  attachment #3: top-1-diff.png (image/png) ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1627:  test-results/vrt-vrt-top-Mobile-Safari-retry1/top-1-diff.png
1628:  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1629:  attachment #4: trace (application/zip) ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1630:  test-results/vrt-vrt-top-Mobile-Safari-retry1/trace.zip
1631:  Usage:
1632:  pnpm exec playwright show-trace test-results/vrt-vrt-top-Mobile-Safari-retry1/trace.zip
1633:  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1634:  Retry #2 ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1635:  Error: [2mexpect([22m[31mpage[39m[2m).[22mtoHaveScreenshot[2m([22m[32mexpected[39m[2m)[22m
1636:  3094 pixels (ratio 0.02 of all image pixels) are different.
...

1659:  12 | }
1660:  13 |
1661:  14 | interface TargetPage {
1662:  at screenshot (/home/runner/work/liam/liam/frontend/packages/e2e/tests/vrt/vrt.test.ts:11:22)
1663:  at /home/runner/work/liam/liam/frontend/packages/e2e/tests/vrt/vrt.test.ts:25:3
1664:  attachment #1: top-1-expected.png (image/png) ──────────────────────────────────────────────────
1665:  tests/vrt/vrt.test.ts-snapshots/top-1-Mobile-Safari-linux.png
1666:  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1667:  attachment #2: top-1-actual.png (image/png) ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1668:  test-results/vrt-vrt-top-Mobile-Safari-retry2/top-1-actual.png
1669:  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1670:  attachment #3: top-1-diff.png (image/png) ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1671:  test-results/vrt-vrt-top-Mobile-Safari-retry2/top-1-diff.png
1672:  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1673:  Retry #3 ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1674:  Error: [2mexpect([22m[31mpage[39m[2m).[22mtoHaveScreenshot[2m([22m[32mexpected[39m[2m)[22m
1675:  3094 pixels (ratio 0.02 of all image pixels) are different.
...

1698:  12 | }
1699:  13 |
1700:  14 | interface TargetPage {
1701:  at screenshot (/home/runner/work/liam/liam/frontend/packages/e2e/tests/vrt/vrt.test.ts:11:22)
1702:  at /home/runner/work/liam/liam/frontend/packages/e2e/tests/vrt/vrt.test.ts:25:3
1703:  attachment #1: top-1-expected.png (image/png) ──────────────────────────────────────────────────
1704:  tests/vrt/vrt.test.ts-snapshots/top-1-Mobile-Safari-linux.png
1705:  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1706:  attachment #2: top-1-actual.png (image/png) ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1707:  test-results/vrt-vrt-top-Mobile-Safari-retry3/top-1-actual.png
1708:  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1709:  attachment #3: top-1-diff.png (image/png) ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1710:  test-results/vrt-vrt-top-Mobile-Safari-retry3/top-1-diff.png
1711:  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1712:  Retry #4 ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1713:  Error: [2mexpect([22m[31mpage[39m[2m).[22mtoHaveScreenshot[2m([22m[32mexpected[39m[2m)[22m
1714:  3094 pixels (ratio 0.02 of all image pixels) are different.
...

1737:  12 | }
1738:  13 |
1739:  14 | interface TargetPage {
1740:  at screenshot (/home/runner/work/liam/liam/frontend/packages/e2e/tests/vrt/vrt.test.ts:11:22)
1741:  at /home/runner/work/liam/liam/frontend/packages/e2e/tests/vrt/vrt.test.ts:25:3
1742:  attachment #1: top-1-expected.png (image/png) ──────────────────────────────────────────────────
1743:  tests/vrt/vrt.test.ts-snapshots/top-1-Mobile-Safari-linux.png
1744:  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1745:  attachment #2: top-1-actual.png (image/png) ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1746:  test-results/vrt-vrt-top-Mobile-Safari-retry4/top-1-actual.png
1747:  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1748:  attachment #3: top-1-diff.png (image/png) ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1749:  test-results/vrt-vrt-top-Mobile-Safari-retry4/top-1-diff.png
1750:  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1751:  Retry #5 ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1752:  Error: [2mexpect([22m[31mpage[39m[2m).[22mtoHaveScreenshot[2m([22m[32mexpected[39m[2m)[22m
1753:  3094 pixels (ratio 0.02 of all image pixels) are different.
...

1778:  14 | interface TargetPage {
1779:  at screenshot (/home/runner/work/liam/liam/frontend/packages/e2e/tests/vrt/vrt.test.ts:11:22)
1780:  at /home/runner/work/liam/liam/frontend/packages/e2e/tests/vrt/vrt.test.ts:25:3
1781:  attachment #1: top-1-expected.png (image/png) ──────────────────────────────────────────────────
1782:  tests/vrt/vrt.test.ts-snapshots/top-1-Mobile-Safari-linux.png
1783:  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1784:  attachment #2: top-1-actual.png (image/png) ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1785:  test-results/vrt-vrt-top-Mobile-Safari-retry5/top-1-actual.png
1786:  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1787:  attachment #3: top-1-diff.png (image/png) ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1788:  test-results/vrt-vrt-top-Mobile-Safari-retry5/top-1-diff.png
1789:  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1790:  Slow test file: [Mobile Safari] › tests/e2e/toolbar.test.ts (1.0m)
1791:  Slow test file: [Mobile Safari] › tests/e2e/page.test.ts (27.8s)
1792:  Consider running tests from slow files in parallel, see https://playwright.dev/docs/test-parallel.
1793:  1 failed
1794:  [Mobile Safari] › tests/vrt/vrt.test.ts:24:5 › top ─────────────────────────────────────────────
1795:  9 skipped
1796:  7 passed (3.0m)
1797:  ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
1798:  ##[group]Run actions/upload-artifact@v4
...

1801:  path: frontend/packages/e2e/test-results/
1802:  retention-days: 30
1803:  if-no-files-found: warn
1804:  compression-level: 6
1805:  overwrite: false
1806:  include-hidden-files: false
1807:  env:
1808:  CI: true
1809:  URL: https://liam-i5j6v7o4i-route-06-core.vercel.app
1810:  ENVIRONMENT: Preview – liam-app
1811:  PNPM_HOME: /home/runner/setup-pnpm/node_modules/.bin
1812:  ##[endgroup]
1813:  With the provided path, there will be 19 files uploaded
1814:  Artifact name is valid!
1815:  Root directory input is valid!
1816:  ##[error]Failed to CreateArtifact: Received non-retryable error: Failed request: (409) Conflict: an artifact with this name already exists on the workflow run
1817:  Post job cleanup.

Apr 04 '25 12:04 qodo-merge-for-open-source[bot]

The schema change adds a new required field 'sample' to the PRCommit model to enhance data representation. A critical migration risk exists since existing records may break without a default value and lack constraints. Overall, the documentation updates and design intent reflect an emphasis on robust, well-documented schema operations.

Migration URL: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/1/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/migrations/1

ER Diagram:

View ERD for frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/1/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/schema/frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma

Apr 11 '25 09:04 liam-migration-local[bot]

The schema changes introduce a new required field 'sample' in the PRCommit model and add relevant migration and schema context documentation. A critical risk is that adding a required field without a default value may break migrations and compromise data integrity if existing records are not handled properly. The comprehensive documentation and consistent naming practices reflect a thoughtful approach to evolving the schema.

Migration URL: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/04f0acf3-7b06-4131-a238-7a283e34fd88/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/migrations/fdc5de74-2cb7-4bdf-b495-5b2eaa739437

ER Diagram:

View ERD for frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/04f0acf3-7b06-4131-a238-7a283e34fd88/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/schema/frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma

Apr 22 '25 06:04 liam-migration-local[bot]

Updates to Preview Branch (NoritakaIkeda-patch-5) ↗︎

Deployments	Status	Updated
Database	✅	Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:26:13 UTC
Services	✅	Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:26:13 UTC
APIs	✅	Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:26:13 UTC

Tasks are run on every commit but only new migration files are pushed. Close and reopen this PR if you want to apply changes from existing seed or migration files.

Tasks	Status	Updated
Configurations	✅	Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:26:22 UTC
Migrations	✅	Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:26:22 UTC
Seeding	✅	Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:26:22 UTC
Edge Functions	✅	Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:26:23 UTC

View logs for this Workflow Run ↗︎. Learn more about Supabase for Git ↗︎.

Apr 23 '25 12:04 supabase[bot]

The schema change introduces a new required 'sample' field in the PRCommit model. This change poses significant migration risks since existing records might fail due to the lack of a default value and missing constraints. The accompanying documentation and adherence to migration guidelines demonstrate a clear and thoughtful approach to evolving the schema.

Migration URL: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/e855dd0a-df43-45d6-afb8-c5a169a86b6d/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/migrations/dde2b0aa-2243-442e-af4c-30b54cd190cb

ER Diagram:

View ERD for frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/e855dd0a-df43-45d6-afb8-c5a169a86b6d/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/schema/frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma

Apr 23 '25 12:04 liam-migration-local[bot]

This migration adds a new required 'sample' field to the PRCommit model. A critical issue arises because the field is non-optional without a default value, risking migration failures and data inconsistencies. The change shows positive documentation updates, but clarifications on intended usage, documentation standards, and potential security considerations are needed.

Migration URL: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/9bec839c-9aa8-4d10-a39b-834531889bfb/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/migrations/675c695f-bd9e-4818-a07c-4fec21b6f080

ER Diagram:

View ERD for frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/9bec839c-9aa8-4d10-a39b-834531889bfb/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/schema/frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma

Apr 24 '25 09:04 liam-migration-local[bot]

This change adds a new required 'sample' field to the PRCommit model. The absence of a default value and constraints poses critical migration and data integrity risks while the purpose of the new field remains undocumented. On a positive note, the change itself is lightweight in terms of performance and security, and further documentation can clarify its intended use.

Migration URL: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/2d43c050-91ff-4e05-b7ba-b156f15031f8/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/migrations/a24f85b2-3722-488b-ac32-341cc8862b2b

ER Diagram:

View ERD for frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/2d43c050-91ff-4e05-b7ba-b156f15031f8/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/schema/frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma

Apr 25 '25 09:04 liam-migration-local[bot]

This migration adds a required 'sample' field to the PRCommit model, potentially impacting existing records. The field poses critical migration and data integrity risks since it lacks a default value, constraints, and proper documentation, which could lead to failures and inconsistencies. On the positive side, the change is lightweight with negligible performance and security impact, and addressing the documentation and default value concerns will resolve the issues.

Migration URL: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/88e27b98-24c7-4c12-b820-b6588d0da314/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/migrations/fe2c3f25-d38b-480b-921b-ff425ca02694

ER Diagram:

View ERD for frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/88e27b98-24c7-4c12-b820-b6588d0da314/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/schema/frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma

Apr 25 '25 09:04 liam-migration-local[bot]

This change adds a new non-nullable 'sample' field to the PRCommit model in schema.prisma. The primary concern is that existing records may fail migration due to the lack of a default value and constraints, risking data integrity. Overall, the update is lightweight in terms of performance and security, but clarification on project conventions for field requirements would be beneficial.

Migration URL: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/45b80d09-0986-4764-a62e-16a39aeb7373/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/migrations/427bfcc2-537f-4e26-822c-f7248a629bca

ER Diagram:

View ERD for frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/45b80d09-0986-4764-a62e-16a39aeb7373/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/schema/frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma

Apr 25 '25 10:04 liam-migration-local[bot]

The change adds a new required 'sample' field to the PRCommit model. A critical risk is evident as the field lacks a default value and constraints, which may disrupt migrations and data integrity. The inclusion of migration guidelines and lightweight design is positive, though clarifications on its intended usage and documentation are recommended.

Migration URL: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/bd728672-521f-4425-a832-3c3bd246f3b4/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/migrations/85a19423-1845-47b1-8767-0f7b11cd4e35

ER Diagram:

View ERD for frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/bd728672-521f-4425-a832-3c3bd246f3b4/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/schema/frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma

Apr 25 '25 10:04 liam-migration-local[bot]

This migration adds a new required 'sample' field to the PRCommit model to enhance data representation. A critical risk is present as the new field lacks a default value and constraints, potentially causing migration failures and data integrity issues. The change is lightweight with minimal performance impact, though clarifications on project standards for new fields are needed.

Migration URL: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/e48289af-f226-4094-9cda-33127881ff97/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/migrations/6aaf6250-1cd5-42f1-a6c3-ff9bd2e36214

ER Diagram:

View ERD for frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/e48289af-f226-4094-9cda-33127881ff97/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/schema/frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma

Apr 25 '25 11:04 liam-migration-local[bot]

The schema update adds a new required field 'sample' to the PRCommit model in schema.prisma. A critical issue is that the field is introduced without a default value or constraints, risking migration failures and data consistency problems. Performance and security are not impacted, though clarifications regarding documentation standards are advised.

Migration URL: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/519f6917-758d-4bcf-bf85-faded14049cf/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/migrations/ba16b8e5-92a3-4279-8e00-52a6d7209d6f

ER Diagram:

View ERD for frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/519f6917-758d-4bcf-bf85-faded14049cf/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/schema/frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma

Apr 25 '25 11:04 liam-migration-local[bot]

This migration adds a new required 'sample' field to the PRCommit model. A critical risk is the absence of a default value and constraints which may break migrations and harm data consistency. The update is lightweight in performance and security, and enhanced documentation reflects a thoughtful schema evolution.

Migration URL: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/4a592148-fc08-4041-aba0-6d815ca4eec7/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/migrations/78aba9ec-6f76-4d98-bb0a-d3fa15a41287

ER Diagram:

View ERD for frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma: http://localhost:3000/app/projects/4a592148-fc08-4041-aba0-6d815ca4eec7/ref/NoritakaIkeda-patch-5/schema/frontend/apps/migration-web/prisma/schema.prisma

Apr 25 '25 11:04 liam-migration-local[bot]

liam
liam copied to clipboard

Update schema.prisma

Issue

Why is this change needed?

What would you like reviewers to focus on?

Testing Verification

What was done

🤖 Generated by PR Agent at a48cc5bba2932b0eff434328c3887f90bd0298f8

Detailed Changes

Additional Notes

⚠️ No Changeset found

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

(Review updated until commit https://github.com/liam-hq/liam/commit/a47ccbbafdd68e2018f0d84499c9f6bf0c349067)

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Previous suggestions

Review of Schema Changes

Identified Issues

Recommendations

Review of Schema Changes

Identified Issues

Recommendations

Review of Schema Changes

Identified Issues

Recommendations

CI Feedback 🧐

(Feedback updated until commit https://github.com/liam-hq/liam/commit/a47ccbbafdd68e2018f0d84499c9f6bf0c349067)

liam liam copied to clipboard

Update schema.prisma

Issue

Why is this change needed?

What would you like reviewers to focus on?

Testing Verification

What was done

🤖 Generated by PR Agent at a48cc5bba2932b0eff434328c3887f90bd0298f8

Detailed Changes

Additional Notes

⚠️ No Changeset found

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

(Review updated until commit https://github.com/liam-hq/liam/commit/a47ccbbafdd68e2018f0d84499c9f6bf0c349067)

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Previous suggestions

Review of Schema Changes

Identified Issues

Recommendations

Review of Schema Changes

Identified Issues

Recommendations

Review of Schema Changes

Identified Issues

Recommendations

CI Feedback 🧐

(Feedback updated until commit https://github.com/liam-hq/liam/commit/a47ccbbafdd68e2018f0d84499c9f6bf0c349067)

liam
liam copied to clipboard