Lars Marius Garshol

Hmmmmm. I'm not sure modifying the expression tree is the best way to go. Could you generate helper functions for these union types as a module and then import and...

I've been wondering whether people really wanted a more full-featured CLI, but this issue (and PR #182) convince me that the answer is yes. I think all of your suggestions...

The CLI jar should also: "Set the manifest in the shadow jar to reference the Main-Class"

The easiest way at the moment is to use [the playground](https://www.garshol.priv.no/jslt-demo) to try out parts of your transformations. Actual interactive debugging is [being discussed](https://github.com/schibsted/jslt/discussions/169), but I don't know that anyone's...

A print function is a really good idea! I'm thinking it might be better to have it print to some internal data structure that can be picked up, rather than...

I agree that the `for` loop is cumbersome for this, and I have been thinking about supporting something similar to the JsonPath syntax. It might still take a while to...

We don't have anything like that at the moment, unfortunately. It would be very welcome, but personally I am not going to write it. Volunteers welcome. :)

Couldn't you just write `[for (myobj) . if (.b or c.e)]`?

I missed that you want to extract part of the structure, and not just the values. My bad. Ok, I need to think more about this.

> Is JSLT expression considered as a first-class jslt type? No. The only things that are considered acceptable values in JSLT are JSON values. > Can I have an extension...