PowerModels.jl icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
PowerModels.jl copied to clipboard

check_thermal_limits on multiconductor networks

Open pseudocubic opened this issue 7 years ago • 3 comments

Discuss best implementation of check_thermal_limits for multiconductor networks, particularly with inactive conductors on a line.

pseudocubic avatar Aug 01 '18 22:08 pseudocubic

The current implementation does not have the correct semantics for multiple phases. The simplest solution for now is to add a check that the incoming date is implicit single phase. A good generalization will require some thought.

ccoffrin avatar Aug 02 '18 03:08 ccoffrin

Will this be resolved by the changes PowerModels v0.15?

ccoffrin avatar Feb 06 '20 00:02 ccoffrin

It looks like we are using correct_thermal_limits! in PMD without problem, but I don't know if calc_thermal_limits is working, I will do some tests. Note that there is a dangling reference to MultiConductorVector (commented out) in calc_thermal_limits

pseudocubic avatar Feb 06 '20 01:02 pseudocubic

Closing as PMD no longer depends on PM.

ccoffrin avatar Aug 13 '23 00:08 ccoffrin