langchain
langchain copied to clipboard
langchain-ai
docs: `ecosystem` change
move Additional_resources items into Ecosystem group
Rationale: ToC groups composed from <3 items are too small. These small groups spent precious ToC space and distract user attention.
Here I merge two small groups.
Maintainer responsibilities: @dev2049
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Ignored Deployment
| Name | Status | Preview | Comments | Updated (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| langchain | ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) | Jul 5, 2023 8:20pm |
![vercel[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/8329?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
we had it like this before but got feedback from other folks that ecosystem was a confusing grouping. maybe we wait to gather more feedback?
we had it like this before but got feedback from other folks that ecosystem was a confusing grouping. maybe we wait to gather more feedback?
I agree that "Ecosystem" is a too broad term and hence confusing. Still, PyTorch uses this term.
This PR is a trade-off between moving "Additional resources" items into "Ecosystem" or opposite, moving "Ecosystem" items into "Additional resources". The latter doesn't work because "YouTube" and "Gallery" can be part of the "Ecosystem" but the "Integrations" cannot be part of the "Additional resources". So, decision was to move "YouTube" and "Gallery" into the "Ecosystem".
How about renaming "Ecosystem" to "Resources" (as in PyTorch again)?
BTW @hwchase17 insisted on "Ecosystem" vs "Integrations" the last time.