Replaced the deprecation-warning partial with docsy provided version-banner

[SayakMukhopadhyay]

trafficstars

This PR replaces the deprecation-warning.html partial with the Docsy provided version-banner.html partial. It further customized the partial to ensure that existing features don't get removed all the while keeping the Docsy provided styling and HTML tree. The following are the changes:

• Removed all styling from _custom.scss that used the now removed ids and classes related to the deprecation-warning partial.
• Updated _default/baseof.html, blog/baseof.html, case-studies/single-baseof.html and docs/baseof.html to refer to version-banner.
• In the new version-banner.html, apart from the content, which is customised for localisation, the deprecated param is still used as that param is used in multiple places and can be challenging to remove all of them at the same time. Alternatively, I can change the param only here keeping all other use of the deprecated param as is.
• In hugo.toml, the currentUrl param is renamed to url_latest_version as that's the one preferred by Docsy and this param is not used anywhere else.

Issue

Closes: #50216

[SayakMukhopadhyay]

/area web-development

[netlify[bot]]

✅ Pull request preview available for checking

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	804388f903c854ee0e19f43a04c71f2bdcc9dd97
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-io-main-staging/deploys/67ffa01b11a9ec00074a40fa
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-50217--kubernetes-io-main-staging.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[sftim]

https://deploy-preview-50217--kubernetes-io-main-staging.netlify.app/community/ looks fine, but if I locally set the site to be an older version, it doesn't look quite right to me. Could we use a <section> with a blue background there?

[SayakMukhopadhyay]

I was able to use a bit of CSS to make it look like before. Hope this is ok.

[sftim]

It's not quite right (hyperlink text should be white, on that page), but it's close enough:

/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 4760c92ea898f80fb041c8bcd18cc7444ba0fdcb

[SayakMukhopadhyay]

Oops, I will fix it when I am doing the another pass (which I will probably need to do anyway).

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: divya-mohan0209

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• ~~OWNERS~~ [divya-mohan0209]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[divya-mohan0209]

This has a merge conflict, @SayakMukhopadhyay. Could you please address it before we merge it? /hold

[SayakMukhopadhyay]

@divya-mohan0209 It's been fixed; it was a relatively small conflict. Probably would need another lgtm.

[divya-mohan0209]

Np, happy to give it another LGTM based on Tim's comment. I had to issue a hold since PROW does weird things sometimes. /unhold /lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: a39f3bfc6ccf4325c9a28021afd5a53179f06aab