website icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
website copied to clipboard

Spotlight for CNCF DHHWG

Open sandeepkanabar opened this issue 1 year ago • 9 comments
trafficstars

Description

This is a spotlight for the CNCF Deaf and hard-of-hearing working group (DHHWG)

sandeepkanabar avatar Sep 20 '24 20:09 sandeepkanabar

Pull request preview available for checking

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
Latest commit da5da8ecf3b65912f059ca2dc314faace928b317
Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-io-main-staging/deploys/66f6ccbcc431090008ec0810
Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-48021--kubernetes-io-main-staging.netlify.app
Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

netlify[bot] avatar Sep 20 '24 20:09 netlify[bot]

contributor-site PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/contributor-site/pull/530

fsmunoz avatar Sep 20 '24 20:09 fsmunoz

This might be a better fit for the CNCF blog

/hold pending confirmation that the Kubernetes blog is the right home for this article.

Understand Tim @sftim. The aim here is to drive inclusion among contributors and kubernetes folks so that they can be allies to the DHHWG and can help mentor folks from the WG. The CNCF will also publish a blog on the WG this Deaf Awareness Month, in addition to a host of other activities too. While there is an audience overlap, publishing on both blogs will allow us to reach a much bigger audience.

sandeepkanabar avatar Sep 21 '24 17:09 sandeepkanabar

@sftim I agree that this is a corner-case, since it's a CNCF Working Group. The reasons why I think that it fits within k8s.dev (at least), and to add to the discussion, re:

  • The link to the Kubernetes ecosystem is the starting point of the conversation, and explicitly mentioned and discussed.
  • This WG has presented in KubeCons (that's the first time I heard them), and the subject matter is one which doesn't fit a k8s WG, while at the same time being important to k8s.
  • It specifically addresses how to make KubeCon itself more accessible.

This doesn't mean it wouldn't also be suitable for the CNCF blog (although I'm not knowledgeable about the publication process or criteria there), just that I personally see it with sufficient contact area with the Kubernetes community. I do however understand that these might be seen as insufficient for others.

fsmunoz avatar Sep 21 '24 18:09 fsmunoz

This WG has presented in KubeCons (that's the first time I heard them), and the subject matter is one which doesn't fit a k8s WG, while at the same time being important to k8s.

That conference, KubeCon + CloudNativeCon, is not just about Kubernetes.

We should leave the hold in place until this is settled.

sftim avatar Sep 22 '24 11:09 sftim

(this would also need an assigned publication date)

sftim avatar Sep 22 '24 12:09 sftim

(this would also need an assigned publication date)

The aim was to get it published around Sep 24. Sep 23 is the International Day of Sign Languages (IDSL) and we wanted to publish this around the date. Also, September is being celebrated as Deaf Awareness month too.

sandeepkanabar avatar Sep 22 '24 12:09 sandeepkanabar

If aiming for publication in the next 7 days I strongly recommend not targeting https://k8s.io/blog/ - we are rather short on review capacity, and I personally like the idea of ensuring we do good quality reviews on every article we publish there.

There's no formal SLA, but I've been suggesting a 4 week turnaround time. We also hope to encourage more people to contribute as blog reviewers and editors.

The audience for https://k8s.dev/blog/ is smaller and we can worry less about getting our message exactly right.

sftim avatar Sep 22 '24 12:09 sftim

/label tide/merge-method-squash

sftim avatar Sep 28 '24 18:09 sftim

/lgtm /approve

sftim avatar Sep 28 '24 18:09 sftim

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 159222d45a987f537c9b527108cd310ceb68a430

k8s-ci-robot avatar Sep 28 '24 18:09 k8s-ci-robot

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sftim

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

k8s-ci-robot avatar Sep 28 '24 18:09 k8s-ci-robot

/hold cancel

sftim avatar Sep 28 '24 18:09 sftim

@sftim - I've a question - We have kept publish date as 30th. So will that be UTC of 30th, or PST or 30th?

sandeepkanabar avatar Sep 28 '24 18:09 sandeepkanabar