secrets-store-csi-driver
secrets-store-csi-driver copied to clipboard
Apparent race condition causes pods to mount secret volumes with no object content
What steps did you take and what happened: Apparent race condition causes pods to mount secret volumes with no object content
What did you expect to happen: We expect a pod to start only if a secret volume mounts successfully with the object content
Anything else you would like to add: [Miscellaneous information that will assist in solving the issue.] Here's a stab at picking out the relevant logs
secrets-store: "I0914 17:56:45.942699 1 nodeserver.go:353] \"Using gRPC client\" provider=\"aws\" pod=\"archive-importer-gcp-usa-central-1-transmission-7d4665cf4-gf7hq\"",
csi-aws : "I0914 17:57:58.141005 1 server.go:107] Servicing mount request for pod archive-importer-gcp-usa-central-1-transmission-7d4665cf4-gf7hq in namespace services using service account archive-importer-default with region us-east-1",
secrets-store: "E0914 17:58:45.941230 1 nodeserver.go:235] \"failed to mount secrets store object content\" err=\"rpc error: code = DeadlineExceeded desc = context deadline exceeded\" pod=\"services/archive-importer-gcp-usa-central-1-transmission-7d4665cf4-gf7hq\"",
secrets-store: "I0914 17:58:45.941275 1 nodeserver.go:81] \"unmounting target path as node publish volume failed\" targetPath=\"/var/lib/kubelet/pods/5890fd63-ad08-4b0f-9c44-64de925d9119/volumes/kubernetes.io~csi/archive-importer-shared-secrets/mount\" pod=\"services/archive-importer-gcp-usa-central-1-transmission-7d4665cf4-gf7hq\""
secrets-store: "I0914 17:58:46.634611 1 utils.go:47] \"already mounted to target\" targetPath=\"/var/lib/kubelet/pods/5890fd63-ad08-4b0f-9c44-64de925d9119/volumes/kubernetes.io~csi/archive-importer-gcp-usa-central-1/mount\""
secrets-store: "I0914 17:58:46.634645 1 nodeserver.go:133] \"target path is already mounted\" targetPath=\"/var/lib/kubelet/pods/5890fd63-ad08-4b0f-9c44-64de925d9119/volumes/kubernetes.io~csi/archive-importer-gcp-usa-central-1/mount\" pod=\"services/archive-importer-gcp-usa-central-1-transmission-7d4665cf4-gf7hq\""
The kubelet logs suggest that the mount attempt for secrets for this pod initiates, errors, retries, and then succeeds. Here's an example:
"I0914 17:56:45.831962 2630 reconciler.go:225] \"operationExecutor.VerifyControllerAttachedVolume started for volume \\\"archive-importer-shared-secrets\\\" (UniqueName: \\\"kubernetes.io/csi/5890fd63-ad08-4b0f-9c44-64de925d9119-archive-importer-shared-secrets\\\") pod \\\"archive-importer-gcp-usa-central-1-transmission-7d4665cf4-gf7hq\\\" (UID: \\\"5890fd63-ad08-4b0f-9c44-64de925d9119\\\") \""
"I0914 17:56:45.937244 2630 reconciler.go:266] \"operationExecutor.MountVolume started for volume \\\"archive-importer-shared-secrets\\\" (UniqueName: \\\"kubernetes.io/csi/5890fd63-ad08-4b0f-9c44-64de925d9119-archive-importer-shared-secrets\\\") pod \\\"archive-importer-gcp-usa-central-1-transmission-7d4665cf4-gf7hq\\\" (UID: \\\"5890fd63-ad08-4b0f-9c44-64de925d9119\\\") \""
"E0914 17:58:45.940859 2630 nestedpendingoperations.go:335] Operation for \"{volumeName:kubernetes.io/csi/5890fd63-ad08-4b0f-9c44-64de925d9119-archive-importer-shared-secrets podName:5890fd63-ad08-4b0f-9c44-64de925d9119 nodeName:}\" failed. No retries permitted until 2022-09-14 17:58:46.440837359 +0000 UTC m=+1221.338406280 (durationBeforeRetry 500ms). Error: MountVolume.SetUp failed for volume \"archive-importer-shared-secrets\" (UniqueName: \"kubernetes.io/csi/5890fd63-ad08-4b0f-9c44-64de925d9119-archive-importer-shared-secrets\") pod \"archive-importer-gcp-usa-central-1-transmission-7d4665cf4-gf7hq\" (UID: \"5890fd63-ad08-4b0f-9c44-64de925d9119\") : rpc error: code = DeadlineExceeded desc = context deadline exceeded"
"I0914 17:58:46.493883 2630 reconciler.go:266] \"operationExecutor.MountVolume started for volume \\\"archive-importer-shared-secrets\\\" (UniqueName: \\\"kubernetes.io/csi/5890fd63-ad08-4b0f-9c44-64de925d9119-archive-importer-shared-secrets\\\") pod \\\"archive-importer-gcp-usa-central-1-transmission-7d4665cf4-gf7hq\\\" (UID: \\\"5890fd63-ad08-4b0f-9c44-64de925d9119\\\") \""
"I0914 17:58:46.642319 2630 operation_generator.go:714] MountVolume.SetUp succeeded for volume \"archive-importer-shared-secrets\" (UniqueName: \"kubernetes.io/csi/5890fd63-ad08-4b0f-9c44-64de925d9119-archive-importer-shared-secrets\") pod \"archive-importer-gcp-usa-central-1-transmission-7d4665cf4-gf7hq\" (UID: \"5890fd63-ad08-4b0f-9c44-64de925d9119\")"
This happens very sporadically when we are scheduling many pods at once on a node, so I am sure resource contention on the underlying node is at play.
Which provider are you using:
We are using the csi-secrets-store-provider-aws.
Environment:
- Secrets Store CSI Driver version: (use the image tag):
v1.1.0 - Kubernetes version: (use
kubectl version):Server Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"22+", GitVersion:"v1.22.11-eks-18ef993", GitCommit:"b9628d6d3867ffd84c704af0befd31c7451cdc37", GitTreeState:"clean", BuildDate:"2022-07-06T18:06:23Z", GoVersion:"go1.16.15", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"linux/amd64"}
Happy to try upgrading if that might help, but I didn't see any issues suggesting it would.
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Mark this issue or PR as rotten with
/lifecycle rotten - Close this issue or PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Close this issue with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Close this issue with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Close this issue with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Close this issue with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale