feat(source): gateway api hostname source annotation
What does it do ?
Adds external-dns.alpha.kubernetes.io/gateway-hostname-source annotation to the GatewayAPI source.
Motivation
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/external-dns/issues/5391
More
- [x] Yes, this PR title follows Conventional Commits
- [x] Yes, I added unit tests
- [x] Yes, I updated end user documentation accordingly
The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.
- :white_check_mark: login: bogdankrasko / name: bkrasko (477f48058872bdf11002acb358d46bc26ccc375c, 73df5d0d0d30b8f65fef725387913ac3322e28d1, 7825cf1067d8ea27645f0de1bf28211c37e5a945, ebeb38466bbe9bd8ad491edbbd26742b57f74f00)
- :white_check_mark: login: bogdankrasko / name: bogdankrasko (03795213f4a3f9b1036055bfb60eeb216fb933da)
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign mloiseleur for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment
Welcome @bogdankrasko!
It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/external-dns 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.
You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.
You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/external-dns has its own contribution guidelines.
You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.
If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!
Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. :smiley:
Hi @bogdankrasko. Thanks for your PR.
I'm waiting for a github.com member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.
Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.
I understand the commands that are listed here.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.
Smoke tests
Setup
args:
--log-level=info \
--log-format=text \
--interval=1m \
--source=service \
--source=ingress \
--source=gateway-httproute \
--source=gateway-grpcroute \
--source=gateway-tlsroute \
--source=gateway-tcproute \
--source=gateway-udproute \
--policy=upsert-only \
--registry=txt \
--txt-owner-id=check-external-dns \
--provider=aws \
--zone-id-filter=/hostedzone/Z00103822***** \
--domain-filter=external-dns-check.engineering
manifest:
apiVersion: gateway.networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: HTTPRoute
metadata:
name: check-external-dns
namespace: check
annotations:
external-dns.alpha.kubernetes.io/gateway-hostname-source: annotation-only
external-dns.alpha.kubernetes.io/hostname: >-
api.us-west-2.external-dns-check.engineering
spec:
hostnames:
- api.external-dns-check.engineering
- api.us-west-2.external-dns-check.engineering
parentRefs:
- group: gateway.networking.k8s.io
kind: Gateway
name: external-dns-check
namespace: kube-system
rules:
- backendRefs:
- group: ''
kind: Service
name: check-service
port: 8080
Master
INFO[0000] Instantiating new Kubernetes client
INFO[0000] Using kubeConfig
INFO[0000] Created Kubernetes client https://*****.gr7.us-west-2.eks.amazonaws.com
INFO[0002] Using kubeConfig
INFO[0002] Created GatewayAPI client https://*****.gr7.us-west-2.eks.amazonaws.com
INFO[0006] Applying provider record filter for domains: [external-dns-check.engineering. .external-dns-check.engineering.]
INFO[0006] All records are already up to date
INFO[0066] Applying provider record filter for domains: [external-dns-check.engineering. .external-dns-check.engineering.]
INFO[0067] Desired change: CREATE aaaa-api.us-west-2.external-dns-check.engineering TXT profile=default zoneID=/hostedzone/Z00103822***** zoneName=external-dns-check.engineering.
INFO[0067] Desired change: CREATE api.us-west-2.external-dns-check.engineering A profile=default zoneID=/hostedzone/Z00103822***** zoneName=external-dns-check.engineering.
INFO[0067] Desired change: CREATE api.us-west-2.external-dns-check.engineering AAAA profile=default zoneID=/hostedzone/Z00103822***** zoneName=external-dns-check.engineering.
INFO[0067] Desired change: CREATE cname-api.us-west-2.external-dns-check.engineering TXT profile=default zoneID=/hostedzone/Z00103822***** zoneName=external-dns-check.engineering.
INFO[0067] 4 record(s) were successfully updated profile=default zoneID=/hostedzone/Z00103822***** zoneName=external-dns-check.engineering.
INFO[0126] Applying provider record filter for domains: [external-dns-check.engineering. .external-dns-check.engineering.]
INFO[0126] All records are already up to date
/ok-to-test
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 19441565668
Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.
This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.
- For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
- To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
- For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.
Details
- 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
- 101 unchanged lines in 2 files lost coverage.
- Overall coverage decreased (-0.04%) to 78.665%
| Files with Coverage Reduction | New Missed Lines | % |
|---|---|---|
| gloo_proxy.go | 47 | 74.18% |
| gateway.go | 54 | 85.93% |
| <!-- | Total: | 101 |
| Totals | |
|---|---|
| Change from base Build 19361247212: | -0.04% |
| Covered Lines: | 15973 |
| Relevant Lines: | 20305 |
💛 - Coveralls
/lgtm
@vflaux Anything left on your side ?
/hold likely we will not integrate HTTPRoute in the future , but ListenerSet as told by gateway-api. We should wait until they finalized the API and what external-dns should do to integrate.
Even if we will follow GatewayAPI and move to ListenerSet, it does not mean we should not consider some use cases with current resources.
=> as discussed on slack with other maintainers /unhold
As external-dns supports HTTPRoute, GRPCRoute, ... I would expect that the functionality related to hostname annotation is supported as well.
@szuecs @mloiseleur @ivankatliarchuk Can we proceed on merging the following changes?