controller-runtime
controller-runtime copied to clipboard
Setting Logger Does Not Propagate To Client-Go
I am a user, in my repo I am making use of the controller-runtime client. I wish to see the debug/trace-level logging that I would get from a client-go client by passing -v 10 to the binary. I attempted to do the following:
controllerruntime.SetLogger(zap.New(zap.UseFlagOptions(&zap.Options{
Development: true,
DestWriter: os.Stdout,
Level: zapcore.DebugLevel,
})))
This is equivalent to binding the zap flags and passing flags to the binary at runtime.
This does not cause any change in the logging output from client methods, as they are configured to use the klog logger by default. The result is that if I want to change the logging level of the client, I must pass flags to the klog logger, regardless of which logger I have controller-runtime using. This is fairly challenging to understand and less than ideal. If I instruct controller-runtime to use zap, I'd expect that to propagate through to the klog.SetLogger() call.
Minimum working example that shows no logs from the client:
package main
import (
"context"
"flag"
"os"
"go.uber.org/zap/zapcore"
coreapi "k8s.io/api/core/v1"
kerrors "k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/api/errors"
"k8s.io/client-go/tools/clientcmd"
controllerruntime "sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime"
ctrlruntimeclient "sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/client"
"sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/log/zap"
)
func main() {
o := &zap.Options{
Development: true,
DestWriter: os.Stdout,
Level: zapcore.DebugLevel,
}
o.BindFlags(flag.CommandLine)
flag.Parse()
controllerruntime.SetLogger(zap.New(zap.UseFlagOptions(o)))
credentials, err := clientcmd.NewDefaultClientConfigLoadingRules().Load()
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
clusterConfig, err := clientcmd.NewDefaultClientConfig(*credentials, &clientcmd.ConfigOverrides{}).ClientConfig()
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
crclient, err := ctrlruntimeclient.New(clusterConfig, ctrlruntimeclient.Options{})
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
existing := &coreapi.Pod{}
if getErr := crclient.Get(
context.TODO(),
ctrlruntimeclient.ObjectKey{Namespace: "test", Name: "test"},
existing,
); getErr != nil {
panic(err)
}
}
In order to get client-level logging out of this, I need to bind the klog flags and set them.
/cc @DirectXMan12 @estroz
I'm not really sure there is anything we can do about this until client-go also uses logr? That is in-progress but happening slowly (kubelet is targeted for 1.21, for example).
Good point, I know klog v2 allows the SetLogger() call but was not sure when that would be available in client-go.
klog has a logr sink -- we could hypothetically call klog.SetLogger. However, that is global., unfortunately. I'd imagine it'd be closer to the expected behavior -- it's been pretty confusing for folks in the past.
re: if it works in client-go -- sufficiently new versions of client-go should work.
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.
Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Mark this issue or PR as rotten with
/lifecycle rotten - Close this issue or PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Close this issue or PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle rotten
We should revisit this now that some more time has passed. Probably more doable now :)
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Mark this issue or PR as rotten with
/lifecycle rotten - Close this issue or PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Close this issue or PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle rotten
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Mark this issue or PR as rotten with
/lifecycle rotten - Close this issue or PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Close this issue or PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Reopen this issue or PR with
/reopen - Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue.
In response to this:
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closedYou can:
- Reopen this issue or PR with
/reopen- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten- Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.
/reopen /remove-lifecycle rotten
@stevekuznetsov: Reopened this issue.
In response to this:
/reopen /remove-lifecycle rotten
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.
@DirectXMan12 @coderanger any idea if this is more tenable now with logging more sorted out? Or am I missing something with how users usually get higher-level logs out of a controller? My use-case is like this: someone trying out my controller has an issue with it working, and I want to see which calls it's making. What's the best way to get that info, if not -v 5?
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Mark this issue or PR as rotten with
/lifecycle rotten - Close this issue or PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Close this issue or PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Reopen this issue with
/reopen - Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close not-planned
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".
In response to this:
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closedYou can:
- Reopen this issue with
/reopen- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten- Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close not-planned
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.