kubernetes-sigs
🐛 test framework: fix e2e config provider's kustomize resource loading using a go getter url
What this PR does / why we need it: This PR fixes a bug with loading kustomize resources from a go getter url. We only need to append the absolute path to provider.version.value if it's url scheme is file or empty. Removed the extra check for version type to check if it's kustomize or url, because both types can have either folder path or url values.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes: fixes https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/issues/12264
/area/e2e-testing
![linux-foundation-easycla[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/17893?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign sbueringer for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment
Welcome @drinkingjasminegreentea!
It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.
You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.
You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api has its own contribution guidelines.
You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.
If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!
Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. :smiley:
Hi @drinkingjasminegreentea. Thanks for your PR.
I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.
Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.
I understand the commands that are listed here.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.
This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the PR is closed
You can:
- Mark this PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Close this PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.
This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the PR is closed
You can:
- Mark this PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Close this PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
/close
xref: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/pull/12360#issuecomment-3047982029
Feel free to reopen if you (or someone else) has time to work on this again
@sbueringer: Closed this PR.
In response to this:
/close
xref: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/pull/12360#issuecomment-3047982029
Feel free to reopen if you (or someone else) has time to work on this again
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.