cluster-api-provider-gcp
cluster-api-provider-gcp copied to clipboard
When Zone not set, reconcile fails after 'clusterctl move'
/kind bug
What steps did you take and what happened: [A clear and concise description of what the bug is.]
- Create a cluster using a bootstrap cluster and not set a
failureDomainon aMachineDeployment - Run
clusterctl moveto move the CAPI resources to the workload cluster
I0707 05:50:46.383763 1 reconcile.go:38] controller/gcpmachine "msg"="Reconciling instance resources" "name"="gcp-test-3521295-md-0-brslr" "namespace"="default" "reconciler group"="infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io" "reconciler kind"="GCPMachine"
panic: runtime error: index out of range [0] with length 0
goroutine 453 [running]:
sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api-provider-gcp/cloud/scope.(*MachineScope).Zone(0x29a4242)
sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api-provider-gcp/cloud/scope/machine.go:103 +0x1d9
sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api-provider-gcp/cloud/scope.(*MachineScope).InstanceSpec(0xc000782840)
sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api-provider-gcp/cloud/scope/machine.go:326 +0x4f
sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api-provider-gcp/cloud/services/compute/instances.(*Service).createOrGetInstance(0xc000b96240, {0x2d4eb20, 0xc0006e7200})
sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api-provider-gcp/cloud/services/compute/instances/reconcile.go:134 +0xd2
sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api-provider-gcp/cloud/services/compute/instances.(*Service).Reconcile(0xc000b96240, {0x2d4eb20, 0xc0006e7200})
sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api-provider-gcp/cloud/services/compute/instances/reconcile.go:39 +0x8a
sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api-provider-gcp/controllers.(*GCPMachineReconciler).reconcile(0x2db9ee8, {0x2d4eb20, 0xc0006e7200}, 0xc000782840)
sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api-provider-gcp/controllers/gcpmachine_controller.go:228 +0x112
sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api-provider-gcp/controllers.(*GCPMachineReconciler).Reconcile(0xc0006a3530, {0x2d4eb58, 0xc0007d94d0}, {{{0xc000345930, 0x284c160}, {0xc0006b5200, 0x30}}})
sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api-provider-gcp/controllers/gcpmachine_controller.go:216 +0xa10
sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).Reconcile(0xc0006a0840, {0x2d4eb58, 0xc0007d94a0}, {{{0xc000345930, 0x284c160}, {0xc0006b5200, 0x413c34}}})
sigs.k8s.io/[email protected]/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:114 +0x26f
sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).reconcileHandler(0xc0006a0840, {0x2d4eab0, 0xc000421dc0}, {0x256fe80, 0xc00045c420})
sigs.k8s.io/[email protected]/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:311 +0x33e
sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).processNextWorkItem(0xc0006a0840, {0x2d4eab0, 0xc000421dc0})
sigs.k8s.io/[email protected]/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:266 +0x205
sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).Start.func2.2()
sigs.k8s.io/[email protected]/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:227 +0x85
created by sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).Start.func2
sigs.k8s.io/[email protected]/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:223 +0x357
What did you expect to happen:
It should be possible to clusterctl move the cluster even when not setting a failureDomain after https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-gcp/pull/584.
Anything else you would like to add: [Miscellaneous information that will assist in solving the issue.] This conversation seems relevant https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-gcp/pull/584#discussion_r852403537.
~Maybe we need to fallback to the API if len(zones])==0?~ After a move Cluster's Status is not yet known, but in either case we want to get the Machine's already assigned Zone, not one from Cluster's status.
Environment:
- Cluster-api version:
- Minikube/KIND version:
- Kubernetes version: (use
kubectl version): - OS (e.g. from
/etc/os-release):
/assign
@dkoshkin If you could help me with reproducing the issue like what is the command you executed?
After which command did you run the clusterctl move?
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Mark this issue or PR as rotten with
/lifecycle rotten - Close this issue or PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Close this issue or PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Reopen this issue with
/reopen - Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close not-planned
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".
In response to this:
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closedYou can:
- Reopen this issue with
/reopen- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten- Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close not-planned
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.