cluster-api-provider-aws
cluster-api-provider-aws copied to clipboard
WIP: 🐛 Add missing Controllers IAM for ManagedMachinePools
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
When creating a AWSManagedMachinePool, the controller lacks necessary IAM permissions. This aims to fix that by optionally including these permissions when the configuration has not disabled this feature gate.
failed to reconcile machine pool for AWSManagedMachinePool cluster-foo/cluster-pool-0: error ensuring policies are attached: [arn:aws:iam::aws:policy/AmazonEKSWorkerNodePolicy arn:aws:iam::aws:policy/AmazonEKS_CNI_Policy arn:aws:iam::aws:policy/AmazonEC2ContainerRegistryReadOnly]: error getting policy arn:aws:iam::aws:policy/AmazonEKSWorkerNodePolicy: AccessDenied: User: arn:aws:sts::1234567890:assumed-role/controllers.cluster-api-provider-aws.sigs.k8s.io/00000000000 is not authorized to perform: iam:GetPolicy on resource: policy arn:aws:iam::aws:policy/AmazonEKSWorkerNodePolicy because no identity-based policy allows the iam:GetPolicy action
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Checklist:
- [X] squashed commits
- [ ] includes documentation
- [X] includes emojis
- [ ] adds unit tests
- [ ] adds or updates e2e tests
Release note:
Fixes missing `iam:GetPolicy` controller permissions when using managed machine pools.
- :x: - login: @toby-archer-tr . The commit (3989e399ba585a69b2f2d956c3d1538690582ab4, a7309944030965c1333bcc8d7bb97e790fc47d15, a19efa10977ed473c047b603235dd957b1501015) is not authorized under a signed CLA. Please click here to be authorized. For further assistance with EasyCLA, please submit a support request ticket.
Welcome @toby-archer-tr!
It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-aws 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.
You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.
You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-aws has its own contribution guidelines.
You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.
If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!
Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. :smiley:
Hi @toby-archer-tr. Thanks for your PR.
I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.
Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.
I understand the commands that are listed here.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign justinsb for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment
/retest
@toby-archer-tr: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.
In response to this:
/retest
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.
@toby-archer-tr: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:
| Test name | Commit | Details | Required | Rerun command |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build | a7309944030965c1333bcc8d7bb97e790fc47d15 | link | true | /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build |
| pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-test | a7309944030965c1333bcc8d7bb97e790fc47d15 | link | true | /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-test |
| pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build-docker | a7309944030965c1333bcc8d7bb97e790fc47d15 | link | true | /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build-docker |
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.
Sorry for the lazy in-github editing, just fixed the build.
Note that this overlaps slightly with https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-aws/pull/5266
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.
This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the PR is closed
You can:
- Mark this PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Close this PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.
This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the PR is closed
You can:
- Mark this PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Close this PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the PR is closed
You can:
- Reopen this PR with
/reopen - Mark this PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close
@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR.
In response to this:
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the PR is closedYou can:
- Reopen this PR with
/reopen- Mark this PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten- Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.