cluster-api-provider-aws icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
cluster-api-provider-aws copied to clipboard

:sparkles: Remove sorting from instance keys when creating input tag specifications

Open AlexVulaj opened this issue 1 year ago • 13 comments
trafficstars

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Currently when generating input tag specifications, we sort all of the keys from the given *infrav1.Instance before appending them to input.TagSpecifications. From the comments, this is done "for tests to work". This currently comes at the performance cost of iterating through all of the tags to grab the keys, and then sorting them before iterating the list again to add them to our input.

By utilizing a custom gomock.Matcher, we can transfer that performance hit from our production code to our tests.

Checklist:

  • [x] squashed commits
  • [ ] includes documentation
  • [ ] includes emojis
  • [x] adds unit tests
  • [ ] adds or updates e2e tests

Release note:

NONE

AlexVulaj avatar Jul 19 '24 19:07 AlexVulaj

Welcome @AlexVulaj!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-aws 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-aws has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. :smiley:

k8s-ci-robot avatar Jul 19 '24 19:07 k8s-ci-robot

Hi @AlexVulaj. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

k8s-ci-robot avatar Jul 19 '24 19:07 k8s-ci-robot

/ok-to-test

damdo avatar Jul 21 '24 08:07 damdo

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign justinsb for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

k8s-ci-robot avatar Jul 29 '24 13:07 k8s-ci-robot

@r4f4: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

k8s-ci-robot avatar Jul 29 '24 13:07 k8s-ci-robot

I rebased my PR today - not sure I understand the error in the PR Verify check but if anyone can point out what I need to do it'd be appreciated, thanks!

AlexVulaj avatar Aug 26 '24 13:08 AlexVulaj

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

k8s-ci-robot avatar Sep 11 '24 04:09 k8s-ci-robot

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

k8s-triage-robot avatar Jan 21 '25 17:01 k8s-triage-robot

/remove-lifecycle stale

damdo avatar Jan 21 '25 17:01 damdo

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

k8s-triage-robot avatar Apr 21 '25 18:04 k8s-triage-robot

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

k8s-triage-robot avatar May 21 '25 18:05 k8s-triage-robot

/remove-lifecycle rotten

damdo avatar May 29 '25 16:05 damdo

@AlexVulaj: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build-release-2-6 e43aba99e95a3bb1fc807c35a033ce06d80ca1e0 link true /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build-release-2-6
pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build-docker-release-2-6 e43aba99e95a3bb1fc807c35a033ce06d80ca1e0 link true /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build-docker-release-2-6
pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-blocking e43aba99e95a3bb1fc807c35a033ce06d80ca1e0 link true /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-blocking

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

k8s-ci-robot avatar Jun 12 '25 16:06 k8s-ci-robot

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

k8s-triage-robot avatar Sep 10 '25 16:09 k8s-triage-robot

/remove-lifecycle stale

damdo avatar Oct 01 '25 07:10 damdo

@AlexVulaj would you be able to rebase this one? TY

damdo avatar Oct 01 '25 07:10 damdo