cluster-api-ipam-provider-in-cluster
cluster-api-ipam-provider-in-cluster copied to clipboard
:seedling: Bump github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 from 2.23.0 to 2.23.4
Bumps github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 from 2.23.0 to 2.23.4.
Release notes
Sourced from github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2's releases.
v2.23.4
2.23.4
Prior to this release Ginkgo would compute the incorrect number of available CPUs when running with
-pin a linux container. Thanks to@βemirotfor the fix!Features
- Add automaxprocs for using CPUQuota [2b9c428]
Fixes
- clarify gotchas about -vet flag [1f59d07]
Maintenance
- bump dependencies [2d134d5]
v2.23.3
2.23.3
Fixes
- allow
-as a standalone argument [cfcc1a5]- Bug Fix: Add GinkoTBWrapper.Chdir() and GinkoTBWrapper.Context() [feaf292]
- ignore exit code for symbol test on linux [88e2282]
v2.23.2
2.23.2
πππ
At long last, some long-standing performance gaps between
ginkgoandgo testhave been resolved!Ginkgo operates by running
go test -cto generate test binaries, and then running those binaries. It turns out that the compilation step ofgo test -cis slower thango test's compilation step becausego teststrips out debug symbols (ldflags=-w) whereasgo test -cdoes not.Ginkgo now passes the appropriate
ldflagstogo test -cwhen running specs to strip out symbols. This is only done when it is safe to do so and symbols are preferred when profiling is enabled and whenginkgo buildis called explicitly.This, coupled, with the instructions for disabling XProtect on MacOS yields a much better performance experience with Ginkgo.
v2.23.1
2.23.1
π¨ For users on MacOS π¨
A long-standing Ginkgo performance issue on MacOS seems to be due to mac's antimalware XProtect. You can follow the instructions here to disable it in your terminal. Doing so sped up Ginkgo's own test suite from 1m8s to 47s.
Fixes
Ginkgo's CLI is now a bit clearer if you pass flags in incorrectly:
- make it clearer that you need to pass a filename to the various profile flags, not an absolute directory [a0e52ff]
- emit an error and exit if the ginkgo invocation includes flags after positional arguments [b799d8d]
... (truncated)
Changelog
Sourced from github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2's changelog.
2.23.4
Prior to this release Ginkgo would compute the incorrect number of available CPUs when running with
-pin a linux container. Thanks to@βemirotfor the fix!Features
- Add automaxprocs for using CPUQuota [2b9c428]
Fixes
- clarify gotchas about -vet flag [1f59d07]
Maintenance
- bump dependencies [2d134d5]
2.23.3
Fixes
- allow
-as a standalone argument [cfcc1a5]- Bug Fix: Add GinkoTBWrapper.Chdir() and GinkoTBWrapper.Context() [feaf292]
- ignore exit code for symbol test on linux [88e2282]
2.23.2
πππ
At long last, some long-standing performance gaps between
ginkgoandgo testhave been resolved!Ginkgo operates by running
go test -cto generate test binaries, and then running those binaries. It turns out that the compilation step ofgo test -cis slower thango test's compilation step becausego teststrips out debug symbols (ldflags=-w) whereasgo test -cdoes not.Ginkgo now passes the appropriate
ldflagstogo test -cwhen running specs to strip out symbols. This is only done when it is safe to do so and symbols are preferred when profiling is enabled and whenginkgo buildis called explicitly.This, coupled, with the instructions for disabling XProtect on MacOS yields a much better performance experience with Ginkgo.
2.23.1
π¨ For users on MacOS π¨
A long-standing Ginkgo performance issue on MacOS seems to be due to mac's antimalware XProtect. You can follow the instructions here to disable it in your terminal. Doing so sped up Ginkgo's own test suite from 1m8s to 47s.
Fixes
Ginkgo's CLI is now a bit clearer if you pass flags in incorrectly:
- make it clearer that you need to pass a filename to the various profile flags, not an absolute directory [a0e52ff]
- emit an error and exit if the ginkgo invocation includes flags after positional arguments [b799d8d]
This might cause existing CI builds to fail. If so then it's likely that your CI build was misconfigured and should be corrected. Open an issue if you need help.
Commits
229c981v2.23.42d134d5bump dependencies2b9c428Add automaxprocs for using CPUQuota31137deRevert "Add automaxprocs to automatically match the linux container CPU Quota"91b11b8Add automaxprocs to automatically match the linux container CPU Quotacdfddb6maybe escape quotes when you put them in a quoted string.1f59d07clarify gotchas about -vet flag7ab7d10bump all the things04a9a74v2.23.3cfcc1a5allow-as a standalone argument- Additional commits viewable in compare view
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.
Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot mergewill merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot squash and mergewill squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot cancel mergewill cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging@dependabot reopenwill reopen this PR if it is closed@dependabot closewill close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditionswill show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign srm09 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.
This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the PR is closed
You can:
- Mark this PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Close this PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
@dependabot recreate
OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor version, let me know by commenting @dependabot ignore this major version or @dependabot ignore this minor version. You can also ignore all major, minor, or patch releases for a dependency by adding an ignore condition with the desired update_types to your config file.
If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it.