java
java copied to clipboard
Security provider support missing from legacy releases >22.0.0
Hi All, I am trying to use kubernetes-client java on a FIPS enabled machine using the bouncy castle FIPS libraries. Commit #3590 allowed for bouncy castle FIPS support and loading of security providers but only seems to be included in release 22.0.0-legacy, and not 22.0.1-legacy or 23.0.0-legacy. Is this on purpose? I'm unable to use version 22.0.0-legacy because of its incompatibility with Java 8.
Client Version 23.0.0-legacy
Java Version Java 8
Server: OS: Linux
I don't think this is on purpose, I think that we need to cherry-pick this into the release-23-legacy branch. Release 22.0.0 was accidentally cut on the wrong branch, that's why it is in that release.
If you send a cherry-pic PR to the legacy branches, I can cut a new release(s)
Ok, I'll go ahead and do that, thanks. Will that code be available in future legacy branch releases as well? (release-24-legacy and so on)
If you cherry-pick it into the master-java8 branch it should also go forward, though it's not clear how long we are going to maintain those branches. Java8 is pretty much 100% deprecated.
I haven't had any time to approach this, is there any way someone can do the small cherry pick of the security providers onto release-legacy-22,23, and master-java8 branches?
@brendandburns @yue9944882
@brendandburns can you cut a new release for the legacy 22 and 23 branches?
Hi @brendandburns @yue9944882 may we have new legacy releases cut with these changes as promised? Thanks
I am also affected by this issue and still require the use of java 8 right now.
@brendandburns @yue9944882 When can we get a new legacy release cut with these changes given they were already merged? Is there something you all are waiting on first?
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Close this issue with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Close this issue with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Reopen this issue with
/reopen - Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close not-planned
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".
In response to this:
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closedYou can:
- Reopen this issue with
/reopen- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten- Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close not-planned
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.