Results 63 comments of Kevin Grigorenko
trafficstars

I'm seeing some new warnings: ``` WARNING T0001: could not complete transform AIXLPARTransform at line 773 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: DataType LPAR does not have a field named EC_Idle% at com.ibm.nmon.data.DataType.getFieldIndex(DataType.java:84) at com.ibm.nmon.data.transform.AIXLPARTransform.transform(AIXLPARTransform.java:63)...

Re-cloned to make sure I have the latest and the Entitled graph looks good but % Entitlement seems wrong: ![image](https://github.com/nmonvisualizer/nmonvisualizer/assets/6618433/29c62b53-c2c4-4844-8397-5215884ef624) ![image](https://github.com/nmonvisualizer/nmonvisualizer/assets/6618433/c7b0f7af-3597-46dc-90a0-638f42ac9981) Also on this: > newData[j] = data[type.getFieldIndex("EC" + "_User%")]...

Looks good, thanks! ![image](https://github.com/nmonvisualizer/nmonvisualizer/assets/6618433/f476a7e4-2d08-4eac-990b-bbf09920a82c) ![image](https://github.com/nmonvisualizer/nmonvisualizer/assets/6618433/7116e091-2d8b-4e53-abe2-1dfb620cc0ce)

FYI, I don't think this changes anything as far as NMONVisualizer, but I was provided a TechNote that explains the idle calculation in more detail: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/high-idle-cpu-percentage

The problem was caused by ThreadPool::stopAll destructing the WorkerThread while it was still running in processLoop. This implicitly destructed the Semaphore which implicitly destructed its fields like name and led...

Created PR https://github.com/RuntimeTools/omr-agentcore/pull/100

An additional symptom of this in jdmpview will show something like the following as frames at the top of the crash stack (particularly the WorkerThread symbol): ``` bp: 0x000000517faff180 pc:...

> do you agree don't need to maintain Wiki I agree. There's also a Wiki on GitHub if needed (though I agree it's better to just integrate content into the...

@krumts This should do a build on a push or pull request. Example success: https://github.com/kgibm/mat/actions/runs/9195053726/job/25289958928

Ahh, I missed that discussion, makes sense. I have no strong preference. I know that it's possible to do things like signing, etc. in GitHub Actions by packaging the necessary...