Kevin Lawler

Replacing _vs with a dummy C return drops the running time down to about 4s. This is evidence that the _vs implementation is the cause. I've created a ticket to...

After 1ba61d5cdb038cbe9ab0 ``` \t +/1+2*&{&/{y~|y:x _vs y}'[2 10;x]}/:1+2*!500000 /5.4s ```

``` \t +/1+2*&{&/{y~|y:x _vs y}'[2 10;x]}/:1+2*!500000 /5.2s, conditional removed by T. Nordin ```

``` \t +/1+2*&{&/{y~|y:x _vs y}'[2 10;x]}/:1+2*!500000 /5.0s, store verbs as integers not pointers-to-function-pointers ```

I have been looking at how to merge your work in /verb into the code. Now that the format for the verbs is correct, we can expand the attributes in...

This is still missing a 2x speedup somewhere.

Yes, with the caveat that you could probably accomplish this by leaving it as two files, but that would be wrong for other reasons: merging the two files is important...

As far as colorschemes go, there are many that do what you ask. This https://github.com/foxbunny/vim-amber/blob/master/colors/amber.vim is not that popular but it has a minimal implementation that works in both light...

branch seems to work so far. tested in neovide and macvim

My first preference is a `--chicago` or `--cmos`. When I looked at it the only change i noticed was this change in the word list. This could be accomplished by...