kapsner

thanks @ramonlins , that works for me as well. However, I do not understand what caused this error message to suddenly appear, while it was working before for a long...

I only did `devtools::test()` and it was was passed locally.

Thx. Let me know the outcome pls, in case of other issues I will go ahead and fix them!

Hi @AnotherSamWilson , I have finally managed to verify the functioning of this branch again: running `rcmdcheck::rcmdcheck(args = "--as-cran")` resulted in the following notes: >❯ checking for hidden files and...

Hello @AnotherSamWilson , thank you very much for the offer to become co-maintainer of this project. Since I also maintain several open-source projects myself and my time is also very...

Hi @AnotherSamWilson , have you in the meantime been able to have a look at this? Can this PR be merged or is there yet missing something?

Thanks @AnotherSamWilson for the quick reply. Here is a short example of the rows, where the results start to diverge from "setting_id" 67 on between both system. The score of...

The wrapper-function with common code to carry out the hyperparameter optimization for different algorithms is: ```r bayesian_opt [11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C #> #> attached base packages: #> [1] stats graphics grDevices...

When diving into the code, the only thing I found was this: https://github.com/AnotherSamWilson/ParBayesianOptimization/blob/master/R/getNextParameters.R#L19: `setorder(LocalOptims,-"gpUtility")` Could it maybe happen that the ordering of the data.table produces different results when ties occur?...

Yes, I have access to the systems (both running in docker containers) and updated the R-version on system 1 - however, the issue persists even with equal R versions. I...