Jörn Zaefferer

Here's a suggestion: npm/bower package name: `cldrtraverse` JavaScript identifier: `cldrTraverse`, or `CldrTraverse` if it refers to a constructor (not required, `jQuery` is also a constructor), either way, this is userland...

@ichernev what do you think about my suggestion in my previous comment?

I'm okay with `cldr-traverse` for the package name, following `cldr-data` instead of `messageformat`.

Similar to variable renaming (#214) this is out of scope for esformatter, which is already complex enough. The same underlying tools can be used to implement that though, like `rocambole`.

Please use https://gist.github.com/ or a similar service that doesn't require download files to view code.

Thanks for the offer. I've created a repo and gave you write access: https://github.com/jzaefferer/esformatter-jquery

> the current behaviour is to stop looking for other config files and use that as the "base" file. Seems fine to me. If someone bothers to create an `.esformatter`...

I don't think this needs to block 1.16. I'll leave it until we get there, would certainly be good to include it.

Dropped the 1.16 milestone.

While this should be included in 1.16. @JamesMGreene @leobalter can one of you tackle this?