Jasper Woudenberg

Agreed! I thought it was the `dir` option at first!

@sayanarijit if you update to the latest version you'll need to change those rtp paths a bit, because I just moved the plugin, sorry :sweat_smile:. I've updated my comment above...

Thank you for the feedback! I'll keep this in mind when I decide what editor to add support for next!

Hey rachidbch, you can already put dictionaries in dictionaries, but performing sequence on a dictionary is only going to work if all the values in it are of the same...

Hey, sorry for the slow response. It's nothing to do with your explanation, I just want to take the time to write you a proper response and haven't gotten around...

Hi @rachidbch, tldr; I believe I see what you're trying to do, but I think a dictionary is the wrong type to do it with. Rather than complicating the implementation...

I think the core of the problem here that writing nice tests for your views is hard. It starts with the compiler only giving you minimal guarantees when it comes...

Probably complicated and possibly a bad idea, but what if we give pass along a credit while generating? Say a generator gets to spend a hundred points and each call...

I just realised another benefit of the credit idea talking with Brian: It would make it very easy to write fuzzers for recursive data structures. Currently you have to actively...

Excellent! I'm working on an experiment in #162 (another potential avenue for simplification if it doesn't impact performance). I'll report back when I have some code to show.