trafficstars
User description
Summary
- include Temporal, LiteLLM and Traefik scrape jobs in Prometheus config
- document new scrape targets in monitoring README
Testing
PR Type
enhancement, documentation
Description
-
Add Prometheus scrape jobs for Temporal, LiteLLM, and Traefik services.
-
Update Prometheus config to separate and clarify scrape targets.
-
Document new scrape targets in monitoring README.
Changes walkthrough 📝
| Relevant files |
|---|
| Enhancement |
prometheus.ymlAdd and organize Prometheus scrape jobs for new services
monitoring/prometheus/config/prometheus.yml
Added separate scrape jobs for Temporal, LiteLLM, and Traefik. Removed Temporal from agents-api scrape targets. Clarified and organized scrape_configs for better maintainability. Included both standard and managed variants for new services.
|
+43/-9 |
|
| Documentation |
README.mdDocument new Prometheus scrape targets in README
monitoring/README.md
Documented new Prometheus scrape targets: Temporal, LiteLLM, Traefik. Explained ports and purpose for each new target. Clarified that dashboards will include new metrics automatically.
|
+10/-0 |
|
Need help?
Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.Check out the documentation for more information.
[!IMPORTANT]
Add Prometheus scrape jobs for Temporal, LiteLLM, and Traefik, and update documentation.
- Prometheus Configuration:
- Add
temporal scrape job in prometheus.yml for temporal:15000 and temporal-managed:15000.
- Add
litellm scrape job in prometheus.yml for litellm:4000 and litellm-managed:4000.
- Add
traefik scrape job in prometheus.yml for gateway:8082.
- Documentation:
- Update
README.md to include new scrape targets: Temporal, LiteLLM, and Traefik.
This description was created by
for 2b778434a4c506e1c822dedff611edc3c4d0b0d6. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍
Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
| ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪ |
| 🧪 No relevant tests |
| 🔒 No security concerns identified |
⚡ Recommended focus areas for review
Service Availability
The PR adds new scrape targets for both standard and managed variants of services. Verify that all these services actually exist in the environment and are accessible at the specified ports.
- targets: ['temporal:15000', 'temporal-managed:15000']
# AIDEV-NOTE: LiteLLM metrics endpoint
- job_name: litellm
honor_timestamps: true
scrape_interval: 5s
scrape_timeout: 3s
metrics_path: /metrics
scheme: http
follow_redirects: true
static_configs:
- targets: ['litellm:4000', 'litellm-managed:4000']
|
CI Feedback 🧐
A test triggered by this PR failed. Here is an AI-generated analysis of the failure:
|
Action: Typecheck |
|
Failed stage: Generate openapi code [❌]
|
|
Failure summary:
The action failed due to a dependency conflict in the npm packages. Specifically: There's a conflict between different versions of @typespec/compiler: - The project requires
@typespec/[email protected] - But [email protected] requires @typespec/compiler@^1.0.0 npm couldn't resolve this conflict and exited with error code 1 (lines 214-242) The error suggests fixing the upstream dependency conflict or using --force or --legacy-peer-deps flags
|
Relevant error logs:
1: ##[group]Operating System
2: Ubuntu
...
150: prune-cache: true
151: ignore-nothing-to-cache: false
152: ##[endgroup]
153: Downloading uv from "https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/releases/download/0.7.6/uv-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.gz" ...
154: [command]/usr/bin/tar xz --warning=no-unknown-keyword --overwrite -C /home/runner/work/_temp/69e367f4-90bc-48d3-a96b-41a5d77ac065 -f /home/runner/work/_temp/0343e3e3-0156-402e-a48d-4ff68baedb8b
155: Added /opt/hostedtoolcache/uv/0.7.6/x86_64 to the path
156: Added /home/runner/.local/bin to the path
157: Set UV_CACHE_DIR to /home/runner/work/_temp/setup-uv-cache
158: Successfully installed uv version 0.7.6
159: Searching files using cache dependency glob: **/uv.lock
160: /home/runner/work/julep/julep/agents-api/uv.lock
161: /home/runner/work/julep/julep/cli/uv.lock
162: /home/runner/work/julep/julep/integrations-service/uv.lock
163: Found 3 files to hash.
164: Trying to restore uv cache from GitHub Actions cache with key: setup-uv-1-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-0.7.6-d92603d25acef1c08e643c37cc2475e5e190deb9690356b084828d60043a591f
165: ##[warning]Failed to restore: Cache service responded with 422
166: No GitHub Actions cache found for key: setup-uv-1-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-0.7.6-d92603d25acef1c08e643c37cc2475e5e190deb9690356b084828d60043a591f
...
199: npm warn @typespec/compiler@"0.61.x" from the root project
200: npm warn 7 more (@typespec/events, @typespec/http, @typespec/openapi, ...)
201: npm warn
202: npm warn Could not resolve dependency:
203: npm warn peer @typespec/compiler@"^1.0.0" from @typespec/[email protected]
204: npm warn node_modules/@typespec/asset-emitter
205: npm warn @typespec/asset-emitter@"^0.70.0" from [email protected]
206: npm warn node_modules/typespec-openapi3-new
207: npm warn
208: npm warn Conflicting peer dependency: @typespec/[email protected]
209: npm warn node_modules/@typespec/compiler
210: npm warn peer @typespec/compiler@"^1.0.0" from @typespec/[email protected]
211: npm warn node_modules/@typespec/asset-emitter
212: npm warn @typespec/asset-emitter@"^0.70.0" from [email protected]
213: npm warn node_modules/typespec-openapi3-new
214: npm error code ERESOLVE
215: npm error ERESOLVE could not resolve
216: npm error
217: npm error While resolving: @typespec/[email protected]
218: npm error Found: @typespec/[email protected]
219: npm error node_modules/@typespec/compiler
220: npm error @typespec/compiler@"0.61.x" from the root project
221: npm error peer @typespec/compiler@"~0.61.0" from @typespec/[email protected]
222: npm error node_modules/@typespec/events
223: npm error @typespec/events@"0.61.x" from the root project
224: npm error peer @typespec/events@"~0.61.0" from @typespec/[email protected]
225: npm error node_modules/@typespec/sse
226: npm error @typespec/sse@"0.61.x" from the root project
227: npm error 6 more (@typespec/http, @typespec/openapi, @typespec/openapi3, ...)
228: npm error
229: npm error Could not resolve dependency:
230: npm error peer @typespec/compiler@"^1.0.0" from [email protected]
231: npm error node_modules/typespec-http-new
232: npm error typespec-http-new@"npm:@typespec/http@^1.0.1" from the root project
233: npm error
234: npm error Conflicting peer dependency: @typespec/[email protected]
235: npm error node_modules/@typespec/compiler
236: npm error peer @typespec/compiler@"^1.0.0" from [email protected]
237: npm error node_modules/typespec-http-new
238: npm error typespec-http-new@"npm:@typespec/http@^1.0.1" from the root project
239: npm error
240: npm error Fix the upstream dependency conflict, or retry
241: npm error this command with --force or --legacy-peer-deps
242: npm error to accept an incorrect (and potentially broken) dependency resolution.
243: npm error
244: npm error
245: npm error For a full report see:
246: npm error /home/runner/.npm/_logs/2025-05-20T19_06_38_933Z-eresolve-report.txt
247: npm error A complete log of this run can be found in: /home/runner/.npm/_logs/2025-05-20T19_06_38_933Z-debug-0.log
248: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
249: Post job cleanup.
|
PR Code Suggestions ✨
Explore these optional code suggestions:
| Category | Suggestion | Impact |
| Possible issue |
Fix service name reference
The Traefik metrics endpoint is typically exposed at /metrics but the service name should be traefik instead of gateway to match Traefik's default container name in most deployments. This mismatch could prevent metrics collection.
monitoring/prometheus/config/prometheus.yml [48-57]
# AIDEV-NOTE: Traefik gateway metrics endpoint
- job_name: traefik
honor_timestamps: true
scrape_interval: 5s
scrape_timeout: 3s
metrics_path: /metrics
scheme: http
follow_redirects: true
static_configs:
- - targets: ['gateway:8082']
+ - targets: ['traefik:8082']
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7
__
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a likely mismatch between the service name 'gateway' and the expected 'traefik' for the Traefik metrics endpoint, which could prevent Prometheus from scraping metrics. This is a moderate-impact fix that ensures correct metrics collection but does not address a critical bug or security issue.
| Medium
|
|
| |
⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 1 secret following the scan of your pull request.
Please consider investigating the findings and remediating the incidents. Failure to do so may lead to compromising the associated services or software components.
🔎 Detected hardcoded secret in your pull request
| GitGuardian id |
GitGuardian status |
Secret |
Commit |
Filename |
|
| 17693055 |
Triggered |
JSON Web Token |
3e9d8ae75a036a468f936c6183da4ce60eda3815 |
cli/tests/test_auth.py |
View secret |
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
- Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
- Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
- Revoke and rotate this secret.
- If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.
To avoid such incidents in the future consider
🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.