Jeffrey Stedfast

What you are trying to do makes perfect sense to me. I'm just not sure if it's the correct flow or not. I've only figured this out for use from...

It's definitely something that is within the intended scope.

Seems someone else had this issue and asked about it on a Microsoft help forum: https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/msoffice/forum/msoffice_o365admin-mso_other-mso_o365b/graph-url-scopes-not-supported-for-smtp-and-imap/4bb49947-f9af-4044-949b-0ab35b285069 They were redirected to https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/search.html?type=question&q=microsoft-graph-* to ask the question again. That site is apparently...

@fabmoll sadly, it seems that might be the case. If I find a way to do this with MailKit, I'll make a note here about it and add additional documentation...

I think it would actually be closer to this (but your assumption is 99% correct): ```csharp imap.Inbox.Store(uids, new MailKit.StoreFlagsRequest(MailKit.StoreAction.Add, MailKit.MessageFlags.Deleted) { Silent = true }); ```

No worries, the docs should be updated for sure.

I've updated the README.md for this particular API change, but I need to still audit the rest of the docs

I haven't had time to look at this, but the only explanation I can think of is that the timeout is due to not receiving the command tag response and...

I/O is the only place anywhere in the IMAP code that throws a OperationCanceledException

Okay, so I think the problem may then be the ContinueWith statement here: https://github.com/jstedfast/MailKit/blob/ae36c45ca02f6fbdb280a5e85cf28c0cab13d04d/MailKit/Net/Imap/ImapFolderFetch.cs#L715-L718 I was trying to be crafty and prevent the compiler from generating AsyncBuilder state machines, but...