Josh Goebel

I don't see any issues with python or cpp examples provided. **We do not care about invalid syntax.**. If invalid syntax highlights poorly (or not at all), that is not...

> Though in this case the syntax is valid and code will run The one python example I tried was not valid. But valid or not the highlighting looked "fine"...

I go where the wind blows. :-) I did some quick research. I think we'd be open to a PR that allows BASIC strings to terminate with EITHER the first...

We'd need a list of all false positives - keywords that are often followed by `(` and then they can be added as excluded matches for that rule.

Yep we need to add guards for all the false positives.

Please see our docs on contributing new languages: https://highlightjs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/language-requests.html https://highlightjs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/language-contribution.html

Closing for inactivity. Whenever you're ready to move forward this would be reopened.

What should it look like? Github isn't helping since it doesn't seem to color the operators...

Please provide actual R source, not just a graphic.

Never seen this [wrt Highlight.js] in all my years of maintainer-ship (on Mac OS X). That said an indiscriminate filter would be fine. It would also need to be applied...