Julia Gustavsen

Hi ! Yes sorry I am working on it. It got removed and now there are new requirements added for its resubmission. It should be back in a few weeks....

Dear @cruzpazv, First off, thanks a lot for your PR. I think it looks like a good approach. I haven't yet had a in-depth look, but I have a few...

Hi @cruzpazv, Thanks for your work and sorry for the slow reply. I will get back to this soon and try to incorporate your suggestions. For the moment I will...

Thanks @cruzpazv we will try to have a look at your solution this week.

Yes I think it should still be checked. I do not see where we have systematically checked this. However the additional unit tests that you added do reassure me, but...

I think this is great! Indeed this way you could get a quick view of the data in plate format which could be very helpful for troubleshooting.

Dear @pachadotdev , Thank you for your submission. You have checked "Regression and Supervised Learning" which would entail a "Statistical software review" (a different issue template to be opened, but...

Hi @pachadotdev , sorry for the delayed response. You have the option of several different types of templates when you open an issue the statistical one is the last choice...

Dear @pachadotdev , thanks for your patience. We are discussing with the statistical editors and will get back to you shortly. Thanks, Julia

Dear @pachadotdev, thanks for updating to address the statistical aspects of the package. Currently there are some srrstatsTODO tags in your srr-stats-standards.R file and we note that "software to be...