Jon Wolfe

Sure -- anything I should look for?

I ran SMS.T62_oQU120_ais20.MPAS_LISIO_TEST.chrysalis_intel successfully and the cpl history file could be visualized with ncvis, including the g2x and x2g fields

ncvis was unhappy with some fields, like x2a_So_t (I think) -- it complained ```` EXCEPTION (wxImagePanel.cpp, Line 651) Y (latitude) dimension has nonpositive range [-88.541950,-88.541950] ```` but I don't think...

Passes: * ERS_Ld5.T62_oQU120.CMPASO-NYF.chrysalis_intel * ERP_Ld3.ne30pg2_r05_IcoswISC30E3r5.WCYCL1850.chrysalis_intel.allactive-pioroot1 merged to next

merged to master

@xylar -- I don't think we expect this to be BFB for current tests with DISMF?

Thanks @darincomeau -- I missed that! But I'll change the BFB flag and add something to the PR description

Passes: * SMS_Ld1.T62_oQU240wLI.GMPAS-IAF-DISMF.chrysalis_intel (dataset not changed for this resolution) * ERS_Ld5.T62_oQU120.CMPASO-NYF.chrysalis_intel merged to next

The only test this PR should impact is already failing on chrysalis, since it specifies debug: ```` SMS_D_Ld1.ne30pg2_r05_IcoswISC30E3r5.CRYO1850-DISMF.chrysalis_intel ```` This test also runs on pm-cpu and currently passes, so we'll...

merged to master and expected DIFFs blessed