Jon Ator

@hleb-albau Haven't dug through the issue linked above- is this being included in v12? @czarcas7ic @daniel-farina

@czarcas7ic is this confirmed to be included in v13? Guessing yes but double checking.

Have you looked at master? From the Bridge Integration I've added a `NEXT_PUBLIC_IS_TESTNET` env var that may solve for the most common need of having the above setup. When you...

OK. I wouldn't know the needs of our ops. Just an idea to keep complexity and maintenance down.

How would this apply to configuration on non-Osmosis chains? Like for Axelar? Which has testnet IBC connections.

You should be able to change the target branch by clicking edit at the top of the PR

@daniel-farina was this included in our testnet work with v12 upgrade?

@sunnya97 is this a stablecoin? If so, could we add the peg mechanism?

@sunnya97 https://github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis-frontend/blob/75ec3cb5f3af3cd779257f4f64c30594c0d7f8b4/packages/web/config/chain-infos.ts#L2127

Logic would likely live here: https://github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis-frontend/blob/8f7c886a722061d0e853d306bc5c3f2bf5c01fc3/packages/stores/src/queries/pools/pool-details.ts#L287-L312 This function would become a getter and we would apply the above outlined conditions as filters on the gauges returned. Instead of using `allowedGauges`,...