John Wilander

> FLoC cohorts do not **_have_** any "meanings". They are simply projections onto randomly selected vectors. There **_is no meaning_** or **_interpretation_** of what they connote. Chrome is simply creating...

Thanks for writing this up, Martin! Apple WebKit has repeatedly said in the context of FPS that we have no intention of relaxing cookie blocking based on something like FPS....

> @johnwilander if Safari has one use for this and Chrome another, with Brave disabling it entirely, is that a good outcome? Sites won't be able to rely on a...

> > One potential way that's been lurking in my mind is to always require a call to the Storage Access API for cross-site, unpartitioned storage access. > > That...

> > An example we've mentioned is to potentially alter wording in the prompt for storage access of a dedicated SSO domain within a set. That is why we've said...

> > We haven't decided on details but the idea is to consider a bounce/redirect that isn't between two domains in the same first party set as a candidate for...

> Responding to @johnwilander > > > > Does that mean if I have a First-Party Set with sites {A, B, C}, the "bounce" pattern A->B->C->A would not be classified...

> Responding to @johnwilander > > > Exempting certain scenarios is not the right framing. This is about finding a path to prevent known cross-site tracking while not breaking legitimate...

Hi! Thanks for filling. Sorry if what I'm asking about below is in the spec. I'm just going off what you write here to get the conversations started. > provide...