Jörg F. Unger

What about storing this at the integrand in case there is a multiplier? This would leave the possibility to define any function (say e.g. A(x)) directly in the integrand, since...

May suggestion was rather not to store it at the cell at all, but rather add this section multiplier directly in the integrand.

Regarding the first issue. The original reason for having these methods at all this was that not all structures (derived from StructureBase) are using the same container for storing nodes...

The general interface would be the time integration scheme (that just requires the current StructureBase interface). However, as already pointed out before, I think merging Structure and StructureBase is the...

Shouldn't this StructureBase exactly be this interface for general timeintegration schemes, where I just provide a (vector) function (in our case the gradient) and it's time derivatives, and then I...

I'm not sure if these lazy evaluation optimization really improves the speed, due to our usage of the vectors/matrix. However, I agree that writing our own interface for matrix/vector multiplications...

I would define that as a student project (e.g. Martinelli proposed a student that has no coding skills, but according to him a strong theoretical background). Any volunteers for supervising...

Appending to the file in each time step (of an explicit computation) was very time consuming. This was used as an intermediate way to store all time steps in mData...

what certainly be a nice feature.

The data is stored at different locations but also with different multiplicity, e.g. shape functions are stored only once for all elements, integrands and history data for each ip separately....